From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D6A3C32750 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 13:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B022064A for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 13:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="dwXW3sQ1" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2403896AbfHBNB0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Aug 2019 09:01:26 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f68.google.com ([209.85.167.68]:34251 "EHLO mail-lf1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726535AbfHBNB0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Aug 2019 09:01:26 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f68.google.com with SMTP id b29so45658062lfq.1; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 06:01:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XPjbHLrTX3WXA9Ntzf5RZ9TssASBW6mGGuFC8KEUjyw=; b=dwXW3sQ1gZHh+gRq6qCK5o3eZJpyhGlJgFFZayH/Sya/bRwtGnN4CZqKyF+rKZku/P udMzRXLJ7pEPcXL7stFEsO47l0qXmt920GmdWDAMVDj18RfIPqn3pQ1y0QlrdLo1ArCK uavw0gIWYA1LuPoZYwcLgbvRIRwuz+vCT5+LNq2RpaEjv9OjwgrGKbiO/tkpurZW3svz 1OZynV3nZj7x2TH+6swuahUxFAANgqT+irGrMK1f+X12Q0DlfRN4zbJ5QH8E8xOrTDb8 e3/eG5XaEyNjVAUo+W3h1jZmIWKc44WXRaZumTyqyN/PWbCnt+xltuWeDj+uJcXe2R7u eq5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XPjbHLrTX3WXA9Ntzf5RZ9TssASBW6mGGuFC8KEUjyw=; b=C8AYtRdqoUTdOaWHWLW+Bkxdk4K6/yrQ12JI4EL18Im1aQeRt8uVJQPd44IkFm8AaG KvjBevzQ9Rd/d4l1EizQXpmaH7fQFQDJpTaIVMg7byezH1QBzZNpv2yFAUHpvHiHMj9A hFS0zmkgzILrdWOZ7Zb8yC9ZuE2Dow8/4AO56Vgyn+nvg8Rl3+6p0jVFIgLkrGTIqOW/ DPUWWXs5s2yPkhFsaIfEhj4fXw4Nk4b9hM2kPIZGbj55WXZDraBux2UMMhMgeJeMMFmD ENwX5UxTzLsU7Vq/vDDb+mKNmE5rTWaNRthpZnf7Hyeg8pp0vjNfzBJ2A76aDGb6s/6l IoAA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXzm8H1thMIWu9AYlhDapL68I0RL8GneWepIoS/9BfTvPm+oagW xD3fO+mz3QxwLB1vXZjmuPDNmsreaJptPW/juAd3MUIR X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxiKkwBi4xLTfvgUAojfGuzhW4u7kOwlwxiEYsHNcEGsyCBb4vsdI8em1/OEli/xASVhzr7eSFPuDI0ByvqFpQ= X-Received: by 2002:a19:e006:: with SMTP id x6mr63042828lfg.165.1564750884322; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 06:01:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <259986242.BvXPX32bHu@devpool35> <20190606185900.GA19937@kroah.com> <4007272.nJfEYfeqza@devpool35> <20190802103346.GA14255@kroah.com> <20190802112542.GA29534@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20190802112542.GA29534@kroah.com> From: Miguel Ojeda Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 15:01:13 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Linux_4=2E9=2E180_build_fails_with_gcc_9_and_=27cleanu?= =?UTF-8?Q?p=5Fmodule=27_specifies_less_restrictive_attribute_than_its_targ?= =?UTF-8?Q?et_=E2=80=A6?= To: Greg KH Cc: Rolf Eike Beer , stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 1:25 PM Greg KH wrote: > > But it still doesn't work for 4.14.y and 4.19.y, so we are probably > missing something there. So if you want to fix that up, I'd appreciate > patches to do so :) Hm... For 4.19.y and 4.14.y, I cannot see the init/exit_module warnings under GCC 9.1.1. What do you mean it does not work? Cheers, Miguel