From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C55C2D0A3 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 12:17:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C66B20728 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 12:17:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="VD1HSg9D" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727209AbgKFMRQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 07:17:16 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51130 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726317AbgKFMRP (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 07:17:15 -0500 Received: from mail-yb1-xb43.google.com (mail-yb1-xb43.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17071C0613CF for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 04:17:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yb1-xb43.google.com with SMTP id f140so965528ybg.3 for ; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 04:17:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xqfIsNEjsKrt4kdC4DaJrSPlEefpbQse4P7YaoOqW9M=; b=VD1HSg9DAnRhD9QqAuEuTpZvuBtVS/xj8qIkD7u90LXglk/3ZO6dXB+gc4z6yKT84B 2lpiZV0hPFJITr/onj13/iFZST36UVUVdXN5Bnczu9b0p/7q/bNggbwOUUCrmr4F8xPa 2FVNWYAkdMTqd4VvRRGdn5alnIop2fNXWzWGd8lH5i5Fy9UN5GO+1IT8l3gAUx1rCyh3 ISTjsWooHiLDAz3cUgQVe8ikDdNT35K/az6b5e9pulPxLq1xgwoMcVhuxQysQ2T27Bf8 U3AP3++lwTxmzCPynkEDOyf6DoY1h7pLZfqml7CO1tW618qsZcTH6VDJiht39hXzoZZ9 GTtA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xqfIsNEjsKrt4kdC4DaJrSPlEefpbQse4P7YaoOqW9M=; b=LIED0hgH2JyXQ77c19vBBfn1tamn891INNLFeqaE8Nl9fIfHNd9OCAWL6odS5Sd4SW 7poaifyVk7PRsRnnfqbtFBEnIpjKgvxYYDv0HRXUOfXzQOu/0WAtsl05bVY9awQbofm8 gD8aN71UbgzmvpTGi2YsKsKmqsOpskr+RHZobgK++c054R8ZDzWwBKGLU1GZ9hIgLFNm RNFyJ2k9SW+bJ8WtTirLwHEWK0WHAtPnWIogtGjU7x+dAHHqqvWLUaYRqusgW77ARKPI 8jVzxcxqXy6FVT1mGYpb43/nTJTVdGLBAwdT8l87FKCafZ53LmL0VHbeHYyd2SDIaqGe gMKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ihx1BFgGgq9hjt1a3t5Y9QwLSO1liu9Dtb3LH92FHxzKeKenM 6fpD69f9bz2LbEejQsrfYktxoK80K4yvzb4nMaQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyBK9j3lnI8h+gfuOxKbNBl9vtHgce0kiD37XYmQsTAV2IGyxIAReaOYLzCkEdCztv7Gmz4XNep+DEA0skcnGU= X-Received: by 2002:a25:4102:: with SMTP id o2mr2227672yba.115.1604665034446; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 04:17:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201103095828.515831-1-poeschel@lemonage.de> <20201106101135.xesjdqg2z3hgpqnv@lem-wkst-02.lemonage> In-Reply-To: <20201106101135.xesjdqg2z3hgpqnv@lem-wkst-02.lemonage> From: Miguel Ojeda Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 13:17:03 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/25] Make charlcd device independent To: Lars Poeschel , Randy Dunlap Cc: Willy Tarreau , Ksenija Stanojevic , linux-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 11:11 AM Lars Poeschel wrote: > > I got an email [1] with a report about a build failure in > hd44780_common. The fix is simple but I don't know the process from here > on. Should I post a v7 of the whole patchset or only a follow-up patch > for the fix ? Either would work (I can rebase it on my side). However, in order to give credit to Randy, if the fix is integrated into a previous patch, then I am not sure where we would put the Reported-by. Randy, what people usually do for your reports on -next (or what do you prefer)? Cheers, Miguel