From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9C5ECE561 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 12:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 896F621529 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 12:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="dKV3aPr9" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 896F621529 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732782AbeITSB7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:01:59 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-f182.google.com ([209.85.216.182]:45464 "EHLO mail-qt0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730984AbeITSB6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:01:58 -0400 Received: by mail-qt0-f182.google.com with SMTP id l2-v6so3055804qtr.12; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 05:18:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OlL9K9hZoSF9Q3fiI6DYCgMaSJxliM/tCILT1RClCik=; b=dKV3aPr95D6vObchkrJnJmo1SFA3I7KqTD5JaJsVQL+Sdja9Qk/ItGqZckMUVOYRSk zMcWQLbvxHxyEsQ0Ip2GkErbcqbA0/n90eBueVnf8NwpDpfe+qpQOj6VgELlLJiTt6tP jotNcVoQLjY//loX/1wbrhtosCSOVzlYumD9K8jbchOfK43kRGvzFn4JI50zBBHOpxIP 4WB4qWM/7M1X9P9CWY/7txKE3Q3ohUE4gBUOVDaL7rIOHVqTNWFZtgYFUYfL8i2W7FgT PEWs0pEyAByePym7BADMvCjJgspJqN4r/DcKJ9VKP2hEzdeqPBCzVJK8s/xXpgFAmsX+ DrnA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OlL9K9hZoSF9Q3fiI6DYCgMaSJxliM/tCILT1RClCik=; b=kspFKMUADrvyPMvatda9yWjfg1l6qGELKGFTywMZXxwgGiz8oecdgazuNGHdpzR5Ss hnZl6vVn95ixmaVwIhUd49xWBs/BwI9r+XFhHX82I5L0fxN0cOHxsfyBSZipRuCVAxuI mvUdlOiF94VqCneaygbH2M8ha6VeKk1gHHjCNyLzROGxp+nohrrtd43WP9N4Zo+d3Jsq 6O9clT1AdTY6UE2CXvrEWfVRAMi1ky3nhCVwu4pBacGNXmAD1SSgjB2Qi7kToOsGK2z7 UT7CdJ+oGA5IkAcV3BgfHaE2jf6cOKEs/UYnD8pyiWoqbU4FYQ/XKuOToCvdPPpE5KmE wQUw== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51BSPvgwdOeUo/1nNcy3T6+MlX2cloynTYRqs1zqLuoM33PBOmuc kElA+N2Qzr4QJG7jllzkoQ0v2Rs9+4nuGVidfF0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYspyxwoEclTVK+yM+MeWkjZzWPvfZDXoVPcN+7+l1w3e6fMkioNFWKgxp2g4Dixw18+hIKjshqEhTSTJVVhcA= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:abca:: with SMTP id k10-v6mr27477364qvb.140.1537445925140; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 05:18:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:ac8:7494:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 05:18:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20180920072205.GC11963@kroah.com> References: <20180918165542.4691-1-miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> <20180918165542.4691-3-miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> <20180918173428.GA21591@kroah.com> <20180919211458.GA8757@kroah.com> <20180919230504.GA20280@nautica> <20180920001024.GD20280@nautica> <20180920072205.GC11963@kroah.com> From: Miguel Ojeda Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:18:24 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Compiler Attributes: naked can be shared To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Dominique Martinet , linux-kernel , Rasmus Villemoes , Eli Friedman , Christopher Li , Kees Cook , Ingo Molnar , Geert Uytterhoeven , Masahiro Yamada , Joe Perches , Linus Torvalds , linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 9:22 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > For this instance, I think we should just revert the offending patch, > which should resolve the issue for everyone and then you can try to redo > your series to get it right the next time. > > Sound good? On one hand, "reverting & retrying" is a good default policy. On the other hand, we are already in -rc4 (i.e. we lose the testing done until now --- note that in this case the revert implies a global change). So whatever makes you guys feel more comfortable. Cheers, Miguel