From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752115AbdBOWmW (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2017 17:42:22 -0500 Received: from mail-qk0-f193.google.com ([209.85.220.193]:36489 "EHLO mail-qk0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751299AbdBOWmU (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2017 17:42:20 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1487175261-7051-1-git-send-email-atull@kernel.org> <1487175261-7051-8-git-send-email-atull@kernel.org> <20170215172157.GA3317@obsidianresearch.com> <20170215180612.GB3317@obsidianresearch.com> <20170215203734.GC5531@obsidianresearch.com> <20170215211528.GA9125@obsidianresearch.com> From: Alan Tull Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 16:42:19 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC 7/8] fpga-region: add sysfs interface To: Moritz Fischer Cc: Jason Gunthorpe , matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel , linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote: > Jason, > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Jason Gunthorpe > wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:54:27PM -0800, Moritz Fischer wrote: >> >>> Well I don't know ;-) With something fdt based we already have >>> parsers there, >> >> Not sure.. How does incbin work in DTB? >> >> We have the FPGA in a s/g list so we cannot pass the entire file to >> libfdt - is that consistent with incbin? > > Well you could attach the (for lack of better word) blob to the beginning, > instead of doing incbin > >> Can we force a specific alignment for the included data? > > I'd say probably, but haven't checked. > >> How complex will the userspace tool be to make the image? > > Userspace can be as complex as it needs to be, imho, if it makes > kernel space easier & safer. > > I'll need to do some more reading over the weekend before I can make > more sensible comments :) > > Thanks, > > Moritz Another thought I have about this is that adding the header to bitstreams can be a piece of independence from DT for systems that aren't already using DT. This includes x86 in Linux. It also includes other OS's that aren't using DT, they can reuse the same image files without having to add dtc. As much as I like DT, it is something I'm having to think about. Alan