From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752411AbcI2Ee7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:34:59 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:35445 "EHLO mail-wm0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750879AbcI2Eey (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:34:54 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20160928182200.15800-1-atull@opensource.altera.com> <20160928182200.15800-6-atull@opensource.altera.com> From: Alan Tull Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 23:34:51 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 05/12] fpga-mgr: add fpga image information struct To: Moritz Fischer Cc: Alan Tull , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , Mark Rutland , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ian Campbell , Jon Masters , Walter Goossens , Michal Simek , Cyril Chemparathy , Josh Cartwright , Matthew Gerlach , Dinh Nguyen , Devicetree List , linux-arm-kernel , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 6:41 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote: Hi Moritz, > Hi Alan, > > generally ok with the change. Cool! > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Alan Tull wrote: > >> -int fpga_mgr_buf_load(struct fpga_manager *mgr, u32 flags, const char *buf, >> - size_t count) >> +int fpga_mgr_buf_load(struct fpga_manager *mgr, struct fpga_image_info *info, >> + const char *buf, size_t count) > > Doesn't this break the both socfpga and zynq if [6/12] and [7/12] are > not part of this commit? > i.e shouldn't 5,6 and 7 be a single commit? Yeah, squashing those would improve bisectability. Alan aka atull > > Cheers, > Moritz