From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1713DC433E9 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 15:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D659F64F54 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 15:01:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234849AbhBBPBh (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2021 10:01:37 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34090 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234984AbhBBPAb (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2021 10:00:31 -0500 Received: from mail-il1-x134.google.com (mail-il1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::134]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE931C0613ED for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 06:59:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-il1-x134.google.com with SMTP id a16so1654294ilq.5 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 06:59:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=cKDGkdAH6hnP9LDv3OSd/rUwsKO2Hnsk5XLdUyUcTiA=; b=ZTxCza8R+qKMO5AULHOV6aqYudyKoCq1ldvPSstkJUe++vlUm6kwA0NSIjetUWvwOr hIFujVH9L2DNpz8drDLj/rv4R4u7/hc79IUf6YfKXT6oZXygc3b2U9r28iB6aIcPKEjU PILiKxbjOVyXEJwzZKbfzJfSBRqk0rHMk6V4WuCLHeuzEPuLwDeEHN/zVlefRb0vETXR hW8Uu2zuCqz/lC+Q8toxwcmf3CL8x+lwD9JbTbxDiMoadqfik9UFDkpZy21GupRbKIe+ iNCoDj7W3qVQOFdsx9vI9u+OjevzmoDAl7NZHeeCimBgM3KOBcgEhJEXekuXfSA5WJvC EY3Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cKDGkdAH6hnP9LDv3OSd/rUwsKO2Hnsk5XLdUyUcTiA=; b=F7Bc9qcTTdr73BLPuxwK0AQ8O9DS46zI8D5RRmosxaEq9FHSRezpLvk+VSnhb2EEv2 BRGKmYt6l0HPvd79TJlzZDsB+1ozPdEVedM9qfsQZqQCNl2gxkBVYQ7Cl8d6dAYn8fhO /vjEoff9WabZ7Obsultcl8ZHMyD0cbIJPaLPY8r99H/GCa4GovHK+/VrCrA5LBvMwTNx xfbBf8HlolAfuSnCCpgK3uu3r6kSkDbTd62cLNc18Iq6sZDOEcCcFPNrNMH5xkXNCv9o Wd6qfuZ/W058kRE7NqclauJKKEYYI9ZG64LPqZ5VkSKIZ1voC3zLGyuOatUbsO9NjfI/ Z1lA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531sk7l2smSlHRkcXygpka6/CBn/gEOMeZjp6EHXd5jBOKyrNBKR umTXyCecxrNFIspd/sqCTnHt1zjsJtmDduDV9LfggA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwlgQNiDbpOt8/s7/PtFHiU3OsbyGtG9ixXUuXmc8Hbf0GbL6accU63MRrf6/lEOgiXrCFgbvKRS3t/0TSABik= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1a89:: with SMTP id k9mr17243624ilv.68.1612277990062; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 06:59:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210202135544.3262383-1-leon@kernel.org> <20210202145724.GA3264866@unreal> In-Reply-To: <20210202145724.GA3264866@unreal> From: Eric Dumazet Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 15:59:38 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/4] Fix W=1 compilation warnings in net/* folder To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Jakub Kicinski , "David S. Miller" , Pablo Neira Ayuso , coreteam@netfilter.org, Florian Westphal , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , Jozsef Kadlecsik , Julian Anastasov , LKML , lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, Matteo Croce , netdev , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Simon Horman Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 3:57 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 03:34:37PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 2:55 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > > > > From: Leon Romanovsky > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > This short series fixes W=1 compilation warnings which I experienced > > > when tried to compile net/* folder. > > > > > > > Ok, but we never had a strong requirement about W=1, so adding Fixes: > > tag is adding > > I added because Jakub has checker that looks for Fixes lines in "net" > patches. Send this to net-next As I stated, we never enforce W=1 compilation rule. I understand we might want that for _future_ kernels. > > > unnecessary burden to stable teams all around the world. > > It is automatic. I do receive a copy of all backports in my mailbox, whenever I am tagged. I can tell you there is a lot of pollution. > > Thanks