From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4705C433FE for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 16:27:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234009AbiBVQ1v (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Feb 2022 11:27:51 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54020 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234003AbiBVQ1s (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Feb 2022 11:27:48 -0500 Received: from mail-yw1-x112e.google.com (mail-yw1-x112e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::112e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A8B9AC92D for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:27:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yw1-x112e.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-2d6d0cb5da4so125357317b3.10 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:27:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ORYINw67pQ5ZoOWHnhKhKbeE417mgacXszCqGXghifw=; b=ZCt6TATiFHlYTc4SrTZQDV0dmODhoa/PcYUzaYZQ/ErkbsLoCq8wH8KsBjXtItT8cS N8SANx/p0FDUp4stmJJ6X5vy+sc4d0MoWVvYqNKrZSPCDtTdfl7uNEPonKk1w2mb3hzk ppng5/yLWk6vADRiH9gAlQb/IonUd/c5sifCkL34G040hUwt/v39rYBorFJZp3edrfCa w0Tai028iJDsxKPrFr0YEFDqTKvwWy3XcJIrA2SSYQ8+CJyPWmNguGCDAJdo6bxzYFXq aUMF9qDcBhmjcEw9jKhUe+KdZCVXb3g+dwY3RVhZiRnIuMiq/+veOV3u6w+wo3Ivxk9b MPpA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ORYINw67pQ5ZoOWHnhKhKbeE417mgacXszCqGXghifw=; b=As6SA+1AIHFkGuqIcf6y9f/Fn7q50Vn0RhlNBIkjYcFpMhRXQy8UZPfx6acbQwSlFN Lx39ItpRLmQcgP6sqOtZ9HJzPmS3gjkOQt8kgTFzBDiBxCuFFuTmXLXiQr7qGZWvqfFv Ao5FSVxYSvRI4OO8bWDbvYVd9tqGGOOB1UTKONoxVXTreA4JPDBYTzy+UdlWXiIxGXTC s+6VSK7XTcS5zDUAUFRVIFw/RoN9qehdemEunGiNssI6yZyCMMCiHdSonrmlt8gKeCY1 TrMMcUTECQyjaxL7fi85XnxcEHA/7YWLKThzAhaoQsKpEdLB6PDJ5gACRczTH+/yLvCQ utPA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5320tzssaiD4r+oXcUOwG/Cae1obxPFfUa3pVuZ35A+bv7OXxut6 cOKZkz8ut5ahHDdNO465KGY1VIGTjlg7NSiunqfQpw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwPwPnelkp+i0QAJ4nyGB9oFEYLPVLrlCn0wrUtvfmdCopNBZdTZ8Wt8KBysg2sSDF7fTxQNI5EOo2AnHqkorQ= X-Received: by 2002:a81:6a0a:0:b0:2d0:c144:4be4 with SMTP id f10-20020a816a0a000000b002d0c1444be4mr24759229ywc.332.1645547238650; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:27:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220221084911.895146879@linuxfoundation.org> <20220221084912.825972694@linuxfoundation.org> <20220222153528.GA27262@amd> In-Reply-To: <20220222153528.GA27262@amd> From: Eric Dumazet Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:27:07 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 29/58] bonding: fix data-races around agg_select_timer To: Pavel Machek Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , LKML , linux-stable , syzbot , Jay Vosburgh , Veaceslav Falico , "David S. Miller" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 7:35 AM Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > syzbot reported that two threads might write over agg_select_timer > > at the same time. Make agg_select_timer atomic to fix the races. > > Ok, but: > > > --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c > > @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static inline int __check_agg_selection_ > > if (bond == NULL) > > return 0; > > > > - return BOND_AD_INFO(bond).agg_select_timer ? 1 : 0; > > + return atomic_read(&BOND_AD_INFO(bond).agg_select_timer) ? 1 : 0; > > } > > This could probably use !!. Probably... I chose to not change code style in a bug fix. > > > +static bool bond_agg_timer_advance(struct bonding *bond) > > +{ > > + int val, nval; > > + > > + while (1) { > > + val = atomic_read(&BOND_AD_INFO(bond).agg_select_timer); > > + if (!val) > > + return false; > > + nval = val - 1; > > + if (atomic_cmpxchg(&BOND_AD_INFO(bond).agg_select_timer, > > + val, nval) == val) > > + break; > > + } > > + return nval == 0; > > +} > > This should really be atomic_dec_if_positive, no? SGTM, please send a patch, thank you.