From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
wsd_upstream <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] lib/test_kasan.c: add workqueue test case
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 11:29:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNNdaiN=J0TU_AjAoH=ECNC8dJWS8HTvJs9nxBkJce9AmQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201203022748.30681-1-walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 03:27, Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> Adds a test to verify workqueue stack recording and print it in
> KASAN report.
>
> The KASAN report was as follows(cleaned up slightly):
>
> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in kasan_workqueue_uaf
>
> Freed by task 54:
> kasan_save_stack+0x24/0x50
> kasan_set_track+0x24/0x38
> kasan_set_free_info+0x20/0x40
> __kasan_slab_free+0x10c/0x170
> kasan_slab_free+0x10/0x18
> kfree+0x98/0x270
> kasan_workqueue_work+0xc/0x18
>
> Last potentially related work creation:
> kasan_save_stack+0x24/0x50
> kasan_record_wq_stack+0xa8/0xb8
> insert_work+0x48/0x288
> __queue_work+0x3e8/0xc40
> queue_work_on+0xf4/0x118
> kasan_workqueue_uaf+0xfc/0x190
>
> Signed-off-by: Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com>
> Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
> Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> v4:
> - testcase has merge conflict, so that rebase onto the KASAN-KUNIT
>
> ---
> lib/test_kasan_module.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/test_kasan_module.c b/lib/test_kasan_module.c
> index 2d68db6ae67b..62a87854b120 100644
> --- a/lib/test_kasan_module.c
> +++ b/lib/test_kasan_module.c
> @@ -91,6 +91,34 @@ static noinline void __init kasan_rcu_uaf(void)
> call_rcu(&global_rcu_ptr->rcu, kasan_rcu_reclaim);
> }
>
> +static noinline void __init kasan_workqueue_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + kfree(work);
> +}
> +
> +static noinline void __init kasan_workqueue_uaf(void)
> +{
> + struct workqueue_struct *workqueue;
> + struct work_struct *work;
> +
> + workqueue = create_workqueue("kasan_wq_test");
> + if (!workqueue) {
> + pr_err("Allocation failed\n");
> + return;
> + }
> + work = kmalloc(sizeof(struct work_struct), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!work) {
> + pr_err("Allocation failed\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + INIT_WORK(work, kasan_workqueue_work);
> + queue_work(workqueue, work);
> + destroy_workqueue(workqueue);
> +
> + pr_info("use-after-free on workqueue\n");
> + ((volatile struct work_struct *)work)->data;
> +}
>
> static int __init test_kasan_module_init(void)
> {
> @@ -102,6 +130,7 @@ static int __init test_kasan_module_init(void)
>
> copy_user_test();
> kasan_rcu_uaf();
> + kasan_workqueue_uaf();
Why can't this go into the KUnit based KASAN test?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-03 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-03 2:27 [PATCH v5 3/4] lib/test_kasan.c: add workqueue test case Walter Wu
2020-12-03 10:29 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2020-12-04 1:32 ` Walter Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANpmjNNdaiN=J0TU_AjAoH=ECNC8dJWS8HTvJs9nxBkJce9AmQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=walter-zh.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).