linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rcu 2/2] kcsan: Rate-limit reporting per data races
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 19:54:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNOcjdr6HNaSP4Q7GTR72vx4bSMa_2O=_9oQwcz3xFk=Wg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANpmjNNt_+EQHLFZyV5_Wq1frU3A=Rh8y5P7Zjp-0cAU2X7N6w@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 at 19:20, Marco Elver <elver@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 16:23, Marco Elver <elver@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Adds support for rate limiting reports. This uses a time based rate
> > limit, that limits any given data race report to no more than one in a
> > fixed time window (default is 3 sec). This should prevent the console
> > from being spammed with data race reports, that would render the system
> > unusable.
> >
> > The implementation assumes that unique data races and the rate at which
> > they occur is bounded, since we cannot store arbitrarily many past data
> > race report information: we use a fixed-size array to store the required
> > information. We cannot use kmalloc/krealloc and resize the list when
> > needed, as reporting is triggered by the instrumentation calls; to
> > permit using KCSAN on the allocators, we cannot (re-)allocate any memory
> > during report generation (data races in the allocators lead to
> > deadlock).
> >
> > Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
> > Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/kcsan/report.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  lib/Kconfig.kcsan     |  10 ++++
> >  2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/kcsan/report.c b/kernel/kcsan/report.c
> > index 9f503ca2ff7a..e324af7d14c9 100644
> > --- a/kernel/kcsan/report.c
> > +++ b/kernel/kcsan/report.c
> > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> >  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >
> >  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/ktime.h>
> >  #include <linux/preempt.h>
> >  #include <linux/printk.h>
> >  #include <linux/sched.h>
> > @@ -31,12 +32,101 @@ static struct {
> >         int                     num_stack_entries;
> >  } other_info = { .ptr = NULL };
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Information about reported data races; used to rate limit reporting.
> > + */
> > +struct report_time {
> > +       /*
> > +        * The last time the data race was reported.
> > +        */
> > +       ktime_t time;
> > +
> > +       /*
> > +        * The frames of the 2 threads; if only 1 thread is known, one frame
> > +        * will be 0.
> > +        */
> > +       unsigned long frame1;
> > +       unsigned long frame2;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Since we also want to be able to debug allocators with KCSAN, to avoid
> > + * deadlock, report_times cannot be dynamically resized with krealloc in
> > + * rate_limit_report.
> > + *
> > + * Therefore, we use a fixed-size array, which at most will occupy a page. This
> > + * still adequately rate limits reports, assuming that a) number of unique data
> > + * races is not excessive, and b) occurrence of unique data races within the
> > + * same time window is limited.
> > + */
> > +#define REPORT_TIMES_MAX (PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct report_time))
> > +#define REPORT_TIMES_SIZE                                                      \
> > +       (CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS > REPORT_TIMES_MAX ?                   \
> > +                REPORT_TIMES_MAX :                                            \
> > +                CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS)
> > +static struct report_time report_times[REPORT_TIMES_SIZE];
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * This spinlock protects reporting and other_info, since other_info is usually
> >   * required when reporting.
> >   */
> >  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(report_lock);
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Checks if the data race identified by thread frames frame1 and frame2 has
> > + * been reported since (now - KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS).
> > + */
> > +static bool rate_limit_report(unsigned long frame1, unsigned long frame2)
> > +{
> > +       struct report_time *use_entry = &report_times[0];
> > +       ktime_t now;
> > +       ktime_t invalid_before;
> > +       int i;
> > +
> > +       BUILD_BUG_ON(CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS != 0 && REPORT_TIMES_SIZE == 0);
> > +
> > +       if (CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS == 0)
> > +               return false;
> > +
> > +       now = ktime_get();
> > +       invalid_before = ktime_sub_ms(now, CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS);
>
> Been thinking about this a bit more, and wondering if we should just
> use jiffies here?  Don't think we need the precision.

Sent v2: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200110184834.192636-1-elver@google.com
I think it's also safer to use jiffies, as noted in the v2 patch.

Paul: sorry for sending v2, seeing you already had these in your tree.
Hope this is ok.

Thanks,
-- Marco

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-10 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-09 15:23 [PATCH -rcu 0/2] kcsan: Improvements to reporting Marco Elver
2020-01-09 15:23 ` [PATCH -rcu 1/2] kcsan: Show full access type in report Marco Elver
2020-01-09 15:23 ` [PATCH -rcu 2/2] kcsan: Rate-limit reporting per data races Marco Elver
2020-01-10 18:20   ` Marco Elver
2020-01-10 18:54     ` Marco Elver [this message]
2020-01-11  5:13       ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-01-09 16:27 ` [PATCH -rcu 0/2] kcsan: Improvements to reporting Paul E. McKenney
2020-01-09 17:03   ` Marco Elver
2020-01-09 17:31     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-01-09 17:42       ` Marco Elver
2020-01-09 20:46         ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CANpmjNOcjdr6HNaSP4Q7GTR72vx4bSMa_2O=_9oQwcz3xFk=Wg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=elver@google.com \
    --cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).