linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>, Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: base: add cpu_device_create to support per-cpu devices
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 13:37:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANq1E4SJZQeAuXhggdnsjRFKFJD01WEnBpcdPC1pkJiv3WegCA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1408706963-23195-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com>

Hi

On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
> From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>
> This patch adds a new function to create per-cpu devices.
> This helps in:
> 1. reusing the device infrastructure to create any cpu related
>    attributes and corresponding sysfs instead of creating and
>    dealing with raw kobjects directly
> 2. retaining the legacy path(/sys/devices/system/cpu/..) to support
>    existing sysfs ABI
> 3. avoiding to create links in the bus directory pointing to the
>    device as there would be per-cpu instance of these devices with
>    the same name since dev->bus is not populated to cpu_sysbus on
>    purpose
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> ---
>  drivers/base/cpu.c  | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/cpu.h |  4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 58 insertions(+)
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> Here is the alternate solution I could come up with instead of
> creating cpu class. cpu_device_create is very similar to
> device_create_groups_vargs w/o class support, but I could not
> reuse anything else to avoid creating similar function.
>
> Let me know your thoughts/suggestions on this.
>
> Regards,
> Sudeep
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> index 277a9cfa9040..53f0c4141d05 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/cpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> @@ -363,6 +363,60 @@ struct device *get_cpu_device(unsigned cpu)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_cpu_device);
>
> +static void device_create_release(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +       kfree(dev);
> +}
> +
> +static struct device *
> +__cpu_device_create(struct device *parent, void *drvdata,
> +                   const struct attribute_group **groups,
> +                   const char *fmt, va_list args)
> +{
> +       struct device *dev = NULL;
> +       int retval = -ENODEV;
> +
> +       dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!dev) {
> +               retval = -ENOMEM;
> +               goto error;
> +       }
> +
> +       device_initialize(dev);
> +       dev->parent = parent;
> +       dev->groups = groups;
> +       dev->release = device_create_release;
> +       dev_set_drvdata(dev, drvdata);
> +
> +       retval = kobject_set_name_vargs(&dev->kobj, fmt, args);
> +       if (retval)
> +               goto error;
> +
> +       retval = device_add(dev);
> +       if (retval)
> +               goto error;

Exactly! As I said, simply setting dev->groups before calling device_add().

However, I really don't understand why we need this as global API.
Skimming over the other patches, you use cpu_device_create() only in
one place. Why not hard-code this all there? It is totally OK to do
device initialization in drivers. All the helpers (like
device_create(), device_create_with_groups(), and so on) are just
convenience functions. The driver-core API explicitly allows drivers
to initialize devices manually.

Nevertheless, this patch looks fine.

Thanks
David

> +
> +       return dev;
> +
> +error:
> +       put_device(dev);
> +       return ERR_PTR(retval);
> +}
> +
> +struct device *cpu_device_create(struct device *parent, void *drvdata,
> +                                const struct attribute_group **groups,
> +                                const char *fmt, ...)
> +{
> +       va_list vargs;
> +       struct device *dev;
> +
> +       va_start(vargs, fmt);
> +       dev = __cpu_device_create(parent, drvdata, groups, fmt, vargs);
> +       va_end(vargs);
> +       return dev;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_device_create);
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU_AUTOPROBE
>  static DEVICE_ATTR(modalias, 0444, print_cpu_modalias, NULL);
>  #endif
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpu.h b/include/linux/cpu.h
> index 95978ad7fcdd..bb790a5621c0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpu.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>
>  struct device;
>  struct device_node;
> +struct attribute_group;
>
>  struct cpu {
>         int node_id;            /* The node which contains the CPU */
> @@ -39,6 +40,9 @@ extern void cpu_remove_dev_attr(struct device_attribute *attr);
>  extern int cpu_add_dev_attr_group(struct attribute_group *attrs);
>  extern void cpu_remove_dev_attr_group(struct attribute_group *attrs);
>
> +extern struct device *cpu_device_create(struct device *parent, void *drvdata,
> +                                       const struct attribute_group **groups,
> +                                       const char *fmt, ...);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>  extern void unregister_cpu(struct cpu *cpu);
>  extern ssize_t arch_cpu_probe(const char *, size_t);
> --
> 1.8.3.2
>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-22 11:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-25 17:30 [PATCH 0/9] drivers: cacheinfo support Sudeep Holla
2014-06-25 17:30 ` [PATCH 1/9] drivers: base: add new class "cpu" to group cpu devices Sudeep Holla
2014-06-25 17:30 ` [PATCH 2/9] drivers: base: support cpu cache information interface to userspace via sysfs Sudeep Holla
2014-06-25 22:23   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-26 18:41     ` Sudeep Holla
2014-06-26 18:50       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-26 19:03         ` Sudeep Holla
2014-07-10  0:09   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-07-10 13:37     ` Sudeep Holla
2014-06-25 17:30 ` [PATCH 3/9] ia64: move cacheinfo sysfs to generic cacheinfo infrastructure Sudeep Holla
2014-06-25 17:30 ` [PATCH 4/9] s390: " Sudeep Holla
2014-06-25 17:30 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86: " Sudeep Holla
2014-06-25 17:30 ` [PATCH 6/9] powerpc: " Sudeep Holla
2014-06-25 17:30 ` [PATCH 7/9] ARM64: kernel: add support for cpu cache information Sudeep Holla
2014-06-27 10:36   ` Mark Rutland
2014-06-27 11:22     ` Sudeep Holla
2014-06-27 11:34       ` Mark Rutland
2014-06-25 17:30 ` [PATCH 8/9] ARM: " Sudeep Holla
2014-06-25 22:33   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-26 11:33     ` Sudeep Holla
2014-06-26  0:19   ` Stephen Boyd
2014-06-26 11:36     ` Sudeep Holla
2014-06-26 18:45       ` Stephen Boyd
2014-06-27  9:38         ` Sudeep Holla
2014-06-25 17:30 ` [PATCH 9/9] ARM: kernel: add outer cache support for cacheinfo implementation Sudeep Holla
2014-06-25 22:37   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-26 13:02     ` Sudeep Holla
2014-07-25 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] drivers: cacheinfo support Sudeep Holla
2014-07-25 16:44   ` [PATCH v2 1/9] drivers: base: add new class "cpu" to group cpu devices Sudeep Holla
2014-07-25 19:09     ` Stephen Boyd
2014-07-28 13:37       ` Sudeep Holla
2014-07-25 16:44   ` [PATCH v2 2/9] drivers: base: support cpu cache information interface to userspace via sysfs Sudeep Holla
2014-07-29 23:09     ` Stephen Boyd
2014-07-30 16:23       ` Sudeep Holla
2014-07-31 19:46         ` Stephen Boyd
2014-08-05 18:15           ` Sudeep Holla
2014-07-25 16:44   ` [PATCH v2 3/9] ia64: move cacheinfo sysfs to generic cacheinfo infrastructure Sudeep Holla
2014-07-25 16:44   ` [PATCH v2 4/9] s390: " Sudeep Holla
2014-07-25 16:44   ` [PATCH v2 5/9] x86: " Sudeep Holla
2014-07-25 16:44   ` [PATCH v2 6/9] powerpc: " Sudeep Holla
2014-07-25 16:44   ` [PATCH v2 7/9] ARM64: kernel: add support for cpu cache information Sudeep Holla
2014-07-25 16:44   ` [PATCH v2 8/9] ARM: " Sudeep Holla
2014-07-25 16:44   ` [PATCH v2 9/9] ARM: kernel: add outer cache support for cacheinfo implementation Sudeep Holla
2014-08-21 10:59   ` [PATCH v3 00/11] drivers: cacheinfo support Sudeep Holla
2014-08-21 10:59     ` [PATCH v3 01/11] cpumask: factor out show_cpumap into separate helper function Sudeep Holla
2014-08-21 10:59     ` [PATCH v3 02/11] topology: replace custom attribute macros with standard DEVICE_ATTR* Sudeep Holla
2014-08-21 10:59     ` [PATCH v3 03/11] drivers: base: add new class "cpu" to group cpu devices Sudeep Holla
2014-08-21 11:20       ` David Herrmann
2014-08-21 12:30         ` Sudeep Holla
2014-08-21 12:37           ` David Herrmann
2014-08-21 14:54             ` Sudeep Holla
2014-08-22  9:12           ` Kay Sievers
2014-08-22 11:29             ` [PATCH] drivers: base: add cpu_device_create to support per-cpu devices Sudeep Holla
2014-08-22 11:37               ` David Herrmann [this message]
2014-08-22 11:41                 ` David Herrmann
2014-08-22 12:33                   ` Sudeep Holla
2014-08-26 16:54                     ` Sudeep Holla
2014-08-26 17:08                       ` David Herrmann
2014-08-22 12:17                 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-09-02 17:22               ` Sudeep Holla
2014-09-02 17:26                 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-09-02 17:40                   ` Sudeep Holla
2014-09-02 17:55                     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-08-21 10:59     ` [PATCH v3 04/11] drivers: base: support cpu cache information interface to userspace via sysfs Sudeep Holla
2014-08-21 10:59     ` [PATCH v3 05/11] ia64: move cacheinfo sysfs to generic cacheinfo infrastructure Sudeep Holla
2014-08-21 10:59     ` [PATCH v3 06/11] s390: " Sudeep Holla
2014-08-21 10:59     ` [PATCH v3 07/11] x86: " Sudeep Holla
2014-08-21 10:59     ` [PATCH v3 08/11] powerpc: " Sudeep Holla
2014-08-21 10:59     ` [PATCH v3 09/11] ARM64: kernel: add support for cpu cache information Sudeep Holla
2014-08-21 10:59     ` [PATCH v3 10/11] ARM: " Sudeep Holla
2014-08-21 10:59     ` [PATCH v3 11/11] ARM: kernel: add outer cache support for cacheinfo implementation Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANq1E4SJZQeAuXhggdnsjRFKFJD01WEnBpcdPC1pkJiv3WegCA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dh.herrmann@gmail.com \
    --cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kay@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).