From: Nathaniel McCallum <npmccallum@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
dave.hansen@intel.com, Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>,
"Huang, Haitao" <haitao.huang@intel.com>,
andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, "Svahn,
Kai" <kai.svahn@intel.com>,
bp@alien8.de, Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
luto@kernel.org, kai.huang@intel.com,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
cedric.xing@intel.com, Patrick Uiterwijk <puiterwijk@redhat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@redhat.com>,
Harald Hoyer <harald@redhat.com>,
Lily Sturmann <lsturman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v28 21/22] x86/vdso: Implement a vDSO for Intel SGX enclave call
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 10:10:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOASepMicT6CrYyDkoYizh4nAZ+1Zn4rGQh7QjfzSK72Fj6u_g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200313220820.GE5181@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 6:08 PM Sean Christopherson
<sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 04:14:01PM -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 2:45 PM Sean Christopherson
> > <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> wrote:
> > > This doesn't compromise the ability to treat __vsdo...() like ENCLU if
> > > > you need the full power. But it does make it significantly easier to
> > > > consume when you don't have special needs. So as I see it, __vdso...()
> > > > should:
> > > >
> > > > 1. preserve %rbx
> > > > 2. take leaf in %rcx
> > > > 3. gain a void* stack param which is passed to the handler
> > >
> > > Unless I'm misunderstanding the request, this already exists. %rsp at the
> > > time of EEXIT is passed to the handler.
> >
> > Sorry, different stack parameter. I mean this:
> >
> > typedef int (*sgx_enclave_exit_handler_t)(
> > long rdi,
> > long rsi,
> > long rdx,
> > long ursp,
> > long r8,
> > long r9,
> > int ret,
> > void *tcs,
> > struct sgx_enclave_exception *e,
> > void *misc
> > );
> >
> > int __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave(
> > long rdi,
> > long rsi,
> > long rdx,
> > int leaf,
> > long r8,
> > long r9,
> > void *tcs,
> > struct sgx_enclave_exception *e,
> > void *misc,
> > sgx_enclave_exit_handler_t handler
> > );
> >
> > This is so that the caller of __vdso...() can pass context into the
> > handler.
>
> Hrm, I'm not a fan of adding a param that is only consumed by the handler,
> especially when there are multiple alternatives, e.g. fudge the param in
> assembly before calling __vdso(), have the enclave supply the context in a
> volatile register, etc...
Yes, but all of those require assembly. The whole point of this is
ergonomics without assembly. Once you can call __vdso() without
assembly, having to resort to assembly to make it useful will feel
painful. I imagine it would be pretty common to pass something like a
jmp_buf reference or a reference to a struct for collecting output
stack arguments through misc.
> > Note that I've also reordered the stack parameters so that the stack
> > order can be reused.
>
> Ah, ret<->tcs, took me a minute...
>
> Does preserving tsc->e->misc ordering matter all that much?
Not really. I was just trying to aid the reader of the assembly. If
there are more important concerns, fine.
> __vdso() needs
> to manually copy them either way. I ask because putting @misc at the end
> would allow implementations that don't use @handler to omit the param (if
> I've done my math correctly, which is always a big if). That would make
> adding the handler-only param a little more palatable.
Fine by me.
> > > > 4. sub/add to %rsp rather than save/restore
> > >
> > > Can you elaborate on why you want to sub/add to %rsp instead of having the
> > > enclave unwind the stack? Preserving %rsp across EEXIT/ERESUME seems more
> > > in line with function call semantics, which I assume is desirable? E.g.
> > >
> > > push param3
> > > push param2
> > > push param1
> > >
> > > enclu[EEXIT]
> > >
> > > add $0x18, %rsp
> >
> > Before enclave EEXIT, the enclave restores %rsp to the value it had
> > before EENTER was called. Then it pushes additional output arguments
> > onto the stack. The enclave calls EENCLU[EEXIT].
> >
> > We are now in __vdso...() on the way back to the caller. However, %rsp
> > has a different value than we entered the function with. This breaks
> > x86_64 ABI, obviously. The handler needs to fix this up: how does it
> > do so?
> >
> > In the current code, __vdso..() saves the value of %rsp, calls the
> > handler and then restores %rsp. The handler can fix up the stack by
> > setting the correct value to %rbx and returning without restoring it.
>
> Ah, you're referring to the patch where the handler decides to return all
> the way back to the caller of __vdso...().
>
> > But this requires internal knowledge of the __vdso...() function,
> > which could theoretically change in the future.
> >
> > If instead the __vdso...() only did add/sub, then the handler could do:
> > 1. pop return address
> > 2. pop handler stack params
> > 3. pop enclave additional output stack params
> > 4. push handler stack params
> > 5. push return address
> >
> > While this is more work, it is standard calling convention work that
> > doesn't require internal knowledge of __vdso..(). Alternatively, if we
> > don't like the extra work, we can document the %rbx hack explicitly
> > into the handler documentation and make it part of the interface. But
> > we need some explicit way for the handler to pop enclave output stack
> > params that doesn't depend on internal knowledge of the __vdso...()
> > invariants.
>
> IIUC, this is what you're suggesting? Having to align the stack makes this
> a bit annoying, but it's not bad by any means.
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vsgx_enter_enclave.S b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vsgx_enter_enclave.S
> index 94a8e5f99961..05d54f79b557 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vsgx_enter_enclave.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vsgx_enter_enclave.S
> @@ -139,8 +139,9 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__vdso_sgx_enter_enclave)
> /* Pass the untrusted RSP (at exit) to the callback via %rcx. */
> mov %rsp, %rcx
>
> - /* Save the untrusted RSP in %rbx (non-volatile register). */
> + /* Save the untrusted RSP offset in %rbx (non-volatile register). */
> mov %rsp, %rbx
> + and $0xf, %rbx
>
> /*
> * Align stack per x86_64 ABI. Note, %rsp needs to be 16-byte aligned
> @@ -161,8 +162,8 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__vdso_sgx_enter_enclave)
> mov 0x20(%rbp), %rax
> call .Lretpoline
>
> - /* Restore %rsp to its post-exit value. */
> - mov %rbx, %rsp
> + /* Undo the post-exit %rsp adjustment. */
> + lea 0x20(%rsp,%rbx), %rsp
>
>
> That's reasonable, let's the handler play more games with minimal overhead.
Yes, exactly!
> > > > That would make this a very usable and fast interface without
> > > > sacrificing any of its current power.
> > >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-15 2:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 110+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-03 23:35 [PATCH v28 00/22] Intel SGX foundations Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-03 23:35 ` [PATCH v28 01/22] x86/sgx: Update MAINTAINERS Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-03 23:35 ` [PATCH v28 02/22] x86/cpufeatures: x86/msr: Add Intel SGX hardware bits Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-03 23:35 ` [PATCH v28 03/22] x86/cpufeatures: x86/msr: Intel SGX Launch Control " Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-03 23:35 ` [PATCH v28 04/22] x86/mm: x86/sgx: Signal SIGSEGV with PF_SGX Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-03 23:35 ` [PATCH v28 05/22] x86/sgx: Add SGX microarchitectural data structures Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-03 23:35 ` [PATCH v28 06/22] x86/sgx: Add wrappers for ENCLS leaf functions Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-09 21:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-03 23:35 ` [PATCH v28 07/22] x86/cpu/intel: Detect SGX supprt Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-09 21:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-11 17:03 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-03 23:35 ` [PATCH v28 08/22] x86/sgx: Enumerate and track EPC sections Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-03 23:35 ` [PATCH v28 09/22] x86/sgx: Add functions to allocate and free EPC pages Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-03 23:35 ` [PATCH v28 10/22] mm: Introduce vm_ops->may_mprotect() Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-03 23:35 ` [PATCH v28 11/22] x86/sgx: Linux Enclave Driver Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-05 17:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05 18:24 ` Jethro Beekman
2020-03-05 19:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-06 19:00 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-19 18:22 ` Dr. Greg
2020-03-06 18:58 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-03 23:35 ` [PATCH v28 12/22] docs: x86/sgx: Document SGX micro architecture and kernel internals Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-03 23:36 ` [PATCH v28 13/22] selftests/x86: Recurse into subdirectories Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-03 23:36 ` [PATCH v28 14/22] selftests/x86: Add a selftest for SGX Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-04 19:27 ` Nathaniel McCallum
2020-03-05 11:33 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-06 15:42 ` Dr. Greg
2020-03-06 19:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-07 17:42 ` Dr. Greg
2020-03-10 13:08 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-11 13:28 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-11 16:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-13 19:24 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-04 19:44 ` Nathaniel McCallum
2020-03-04 19:51 ` Nathaniel McCallum
2020-03-06 5:32 ` Dr. Greg
2020-03-06 19:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-10 19:29 ` Haitao Huang
2020-03-11 9:13 ` Dr. Greg
2020-03-11 17:15 ` Haitao Huang
2020-03-17 1:07 ` Dr. Greg
2020-03-03 23:36 ` [PATCH v28 15/22] x86/sgx: Add provisioning Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-03 23:36 ` [PATCH v28 16/22] x86/sgx: Add a page reclaimer Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-05 19:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-06 18:47 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-12 18:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-15 0:27 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-15 1:17 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-09 21:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-03 23:36 ` [PATCH v28 17/22] x86/sgx: ptrace() support for the SGX driver Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-03 23:36 ` [PATCH v28 18/22] x86/vdso: Add support for exception fixup in vDSO functions Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-03 23:36 ` [PATCH v28 19/22] x86/fault: Add helper function to sanitize error code Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-03 23:36 ` [PATCH v28 20/22] x86/traps: Attempt to fixup exceptions in vDSO before signaling Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-03 23:36 ` [PATCH v28 21/22] x86/vdso: Implement a vDSO for Intel SGX enclave call Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-11 17:30 ` Nathaniel McCallum
2020-03-11 17:38 ` Jethro Beekman
2020-03-11 19:15 ` Nathaniel McCallum
2020-03-13 15:48 ` Nathaniel McCallum
2020-03-13 16:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-13 18:32 ` Nathaniel McCallum
2020-03-13 18:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-13 20:14 ` Nathaniel McCallum
2020-03-13 22:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-14 14:10 ` Nathaniel McCallum [this message]
2020-03-18 23:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-19 0:38 ` Xing, Cedric
2020-03-19 1:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-20 13:55 ` Nathaniel McCallum
2020-03-15 1:25 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-15 17:53 ` Nathaniel McCallum
2020-03-16 13:31 ` Jethro Beekman
2020-03-16 13:57 ` Nathaniel McCallum
2020-03-16 13:59 ` Jethro Beekman
2020-03-16 14:03 ` Nathaniel McCallum
2020-03-16 17:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-16 21:27 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-16 21:29 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-16 22:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-16 23:56 ` Xing, Cedric
2020-03-18 22:01 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-18 22:18 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-16 13:56 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-16 14:01 ` Nathaniel McCallum
2020-03-16 21:38 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-16 22:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-16 23:50 ` Xing, Cedric
2020-03-16 23:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-17 0:18 ` Xing, Cedric
2020-03-17 0:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-17 16:37 ` Nathaniel McCallum
2020-03-17 16:50 ` Nathaniel McCallum
2020-03-17 21:40 ` Xing, Cedric
2020-03-17 22:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-17 22:36 ` Xing, Cedric
2020-03-17 23:57 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-17 22:23 ` Xing, Cedric
2020-03-18 13:01 ` Nathaniel McCallum
2020-03-20 15:53 ` Nathaniel McCallum
2020-03-17 16:28 ` Nathaniel McCallum
2020-03-18 22:58 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-18 22:39 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-11 19:30 ` Nathaniel McCallum
2020-03-13 0:52 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-13 16:07 ` Nathaniel McCallum
2020-03-13 16:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-03 23:36 ` [PATCH v28 22/22] selftests/x86: Add vDSO selftest for SGX Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-04 19:24 ` [PATCH v28 00/22] Intel SGX foundations Nathaniel McCallum
2020-03-17 16:00 ` Jordan Hand
2020-03-18 21:56 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-19 17:16 ` Dr. Greg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOASepMicT6CrYyDkoYizh4nAZ+1Zn4rGQh7QjfzSK72Fj6u_g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=npmccallum@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=cedric.xing@intel.com \
--cc=ckuehl@redhat.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=haitao.huang@intel.com \
--cc=harald@redhat.com \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jethro@fortanix.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kai.svahn@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsturman@redhat.com \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
--cc=puiterwijk@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).