From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756350AbdLVQaZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2017 11:30:25 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:42118 "EHLO mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752912AbdLVQaV (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2017 11:30:21 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBosZUYwhZ/jDNe86NSmckjkn+PYDt1PzKOBAStf66iYpEv8FJBLtlgb5zGSe0dhE8gdCLs3nuG5J3LjMeQYkHMQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1513955241-10985-14-git-send-email-eugen.hristev@microchip.com> References: <1513955241-10985-1-git-send-email-eugen.hristev@microchip.com> <1513955241-10985-14-git-send-email-eugen.hristev@microchip.com> From: Philippe Ombredanne Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 17:29:40 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] input: touchscreen: sama5d2_rts: SAMA5D2 Resistive touchscreen driver To: Eugen Hristev Cc: Nicolas Ferre , ludovic.desroches@microchip.com, Alexandre Belloni , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , LKML , Jonathan Cameron , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Torokhov Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Eugen, On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Eugen Hristev wrote: > This is the implementation of the Microchip SAMA5D2 SOC resistive > touchscreen driver. > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/sama5d2_rts.c > @@ -0,0 +1,287 @@ > +/* > + * Microchip resistive touchscreen (RTS) driver for SAMA5D2. > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2017 Microchip Technology, > + * Author: Eugen Hristev > + * > + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > + */ IMHO this should be this as a the first line instead as documented in Thomas patch set [0] : > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 I am just a lowly messenger and my weightless voice is as light as the down feather of a new born goose. But if you have concerns with using C++ comment styles as you should, please read Linus [1][2][3], Thomas[4] and Greg[5] comments on the topic. [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/4/934 [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/2/715 [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/25/125 [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/25/133 [4] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/2/805 [5] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/10/19/165 -- Cordially Philippe Ombredanne, a kernel licensing scruffy