linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: make 64 bit ret_from_fork a little more similar to 32 bit
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 12:41:29 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOJsxLHwvMZaR-09u2iTpu2ksCxypLJXG0Cw6Aeu5zWcLYYxpg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1309870814-14181-2-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com>

On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
> The 64 bit version resets EFLAGS before calling schedule_tail() and
> therefore leaves EFLAGS.IF clear. 32 bit resets EFLAGS after calling
> schedule_tail() and therefore leaves EFLAGS.IF set. I don't think
> there is any practical difference between the two approaches since
> interrupts are actually reenabled within schedule_tail
> (schedule_tail->finish_task_switch->finish_lock_switch->raw_spin_unlock_irq->...->local_irq_enable)
> so arbitrarily pick the 32 bit version and make 64 bit look like that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> Cc: x86@kernel.org

Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-06  9:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-05 10:47 [Q x86-64] on kernel_eflags Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-07-05 11:00 ` Ian Campbell
2011-07-05 11:15   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-07-05 13:00     ` [PATCH 1/3] x86: drop unnecessary kernel_eflags variable from 64 bit Ian Campbell
2011-07-05 13:28       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-07-06  9:25         ` Ian Campbell
2011-07-06  9:46           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-07-06  9:57             ` Ian Campbell
2011-07-06 10:12               ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-07-06  9:39       ` Pekka Enberg
2011-07-06 23:17         ` Andi Kleen
2011-07-07  0:00           ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-05 13:00     ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: make 64 bit ret_from_fork a little more similar to 32 bit Ian Campbell
2011-07-06  9:41       ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2011-07-05 13:00     ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: ret_from_fork: use symbolic contants for bits in EFLAGS Ian Campbell
2011-07-06  9:36       ` Pekka Enberg
2011-07-05 17:47 ` [Q x86-64] on kernel_eflags H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-05 17:56   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-07-06  9:25   ` Ian Campbell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-07-25  9:58 [PATCH 0/3] minor cleanups to EFLAGS initialisation in ret_from_fork Ian Campbell
2011-07-25 10:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: make 64 bit ret_from_fork a little more similar to 32 bit Ian Campbell
2010-02-09 15:56 [PATCH 0/3] x86: slightly unify ret_from_fork Ian Campbell
2010-02-09 15:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: make 64 bit ret_from_fork a little more similar to 32 bit Ian Campbell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAOJsxLHwvMZaR-09u2iTpu2ksCxypLJXG0Cw6Aeu5zWcLYYxpg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).