From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751818Ab2KSB4P (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:56:15 -0500 Received: from mail-oa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.219.46]:36661 "EHLO mail-oa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751459Ab2KSB4O (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:56:14 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20121003072815.GA1590@ioremap.net> References: <1346950139-17059-1-git-send-email-fabio.estevam@freescale.com> <5069D830.6070307@freescale.com> <20121002053223.GA20786@ioremap.net> <20121003072815.GA1590@ioremap.net> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 23:56:13 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] w1: mxc_w1: Adapt the clock name to the new clock framework From: Fabio Estevam To: Evgeniy Polyakov Cc: Fabio Estevam , s.hauer@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, GregKH , Greg Kroah-Hartman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Sascha, On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:04:19PM -0300, Fabio Estevam (festevam@gmail.com) wrote: >> > I have no objections per se, but I'm hardly an expert in imx clock >> > framework :) >> > >> > Since it is only one patch in set of 3, I suppose it will be pushed >> > through different tree than w1. Feel free to add my ack. >> > >> > Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov >> >> Could this series go via your tree? > > Please send it to Greg (added to CC), but I would like someone who knows > this platform (and not only w1 bits, which look good) to acknowledge changes, > feel free to add mine. Could you please ack this series? Greg, Should I re-send the patches with Evgeniy and Sascha's acks? Thanks, Fabio Estevam