From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757163AbcK3NUF (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:20:05 -0500 Received: from mail-oi0-f68.google.com ([209.85.218.68]:35050 "EHLO mail-oi0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757069AbcK3NTz (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:19:55 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161124233824.17424-1-gary.bisson@boundarydevices.com> References: <20161124233824.17424-1-gary.bisson@boundarydevices.com> From: Fabio Estevam Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 11:19:53 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC] pinctrl: imx: use radix trees for groups and functions To: Gary Bisson Cc: Linus Walleij , Shawn Guo , Peng Fan , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , linux-kernel , Pantelis Antoniou , Vladimir Zapolskiy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Gary, On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Gary Bisson wrote: > This change is inspired from the pinctrl-single architecture. > > The problem with current implementation is that it isn't possible > to add/remove functions and/or groups dynamically. The radix tree > offers an easy way to do so. The intent is to offer a follow-up > patch later that will enable the use of pinctrl nodes in dt-overlays. Maybe you could re-post it including the follow-up patch that allows the usage of pinctrl nodes in dt-overlays? This way we can have a better picture of the final result. Thanks