From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A2AC43441 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 14:13:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D2B522360 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 14:13:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="qzTZLO3/" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4D2B522360 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731618AbeKNALb (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2018 19:11:31 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f68.google.com ([209.85.210.68]:36702 "EHLO mail-ot1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728943AbeKNALb (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2018 19:11:31 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-f68.google.com with SMTP id k98so11413970otk.3; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 06:13:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JB3vi4EeqWmIjaDzb8126yCGBVdL62uWNmyU9Iz5tts=; b=qzTZLO3/NP6Rss+HMJu8/S/s6TzuomlSg6btbinyo2ZDTqWqO7+dNrN6K1OvXFEqvs 0blcGHFUrL5PdgZ/PzFro24osf/YdyQHgyeRz+wk3rFWVuzef5AmIMGTcHOc2roPdLUh SePEfkeTMB4x+PVil0L4AUZ24elSbfK1X6g8ApoUc5Iu3KbN0O8rrPE9R7dQKNVLNN1J F/+tD9ELZfOIfsFntuopP79K7k/MKWXQy1C7m3atEAJLxw1Rsbhb68HT7vlBTeNw/z/F lumxizBUzYubcTiE467KLI8mQ13n63jTXOLLahXOFg0mtMBoPn2qwclxHR0WVyR5xZ3Z FaPw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JB3vi4EeqWmIjaDzb8126yCGBVdL62uWNmyU9Iz5tts=; b=A8J0H7XGTlWaANAhEa6OwOdM5K6qJlnBCJ6MX7aaodPHgqnpxlpe0KjL6XfzSeb2e2 Mky9+1t7FBnbvh1Okk7HigjBOvLrSJKLDXTZJj5OlXhepmxg/dvQYpL/hfDfnSt3DQpx kt0wCMXhwDV5rkrXSJ7iIXUxYD8AS6cQ/71eBzyo5z8LfhfSfKNRswDqW8R+xIllNxOE 6xXzyJdf4FZSVYHgCIOCkgSLh7X8LWj0VzfHlBYdM/7PJEvHtwGj+wQqgtRz4f16QA7k 87E2/h2L7/TC+M2U6yOumsVMhyfrA6+dvqHV39XdIKxmnu2hpOY4VgB8RW6lD3Q+1VpD g8Aw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gL02gn3F+k+FQ748iJ8zDUxTmgsime4p13Yo9zs6X9Kxowg8QAG ykZJGQcP8LdYcgnjSGTA2BLoOQxFZGTQug7nNz0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fpnMrQwOesirvPaplxN6VYumlg1Syp9wzdl2UPHRUVAVtFy+6ANnhJyzllYePU7B+dp1CBvV2/k4xrQ27t0kg= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:411:: with SMTP id 17mr3082557otc.78.1542118390549; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 06:13:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9a9616d2-a189-bd0e-e2e6-f84bdcb1dfd1@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <9a9616d2-a189-bd0e-e2e6-f84bdcb1dfd1@cisco.com> From: Fabio Estevam Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:13:09 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] media: sunxi: Add A10 CSI driver To: Hans Verkuil , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Maxime Ripard , Hans Verkuil , Sakari Ailus , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Thomas Petazzoni , Laurent Pinchart , linux-media , Andrzej Hajda , Chen-Yu Tsai , linux-kernel , "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Mark Rutland , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Hans, On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 11:37 AM Hans Verkuil wrote: > > On 11/13/18 13:48, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 6:25 AM Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun4i-csi/sun4i_csi.c > >> @@ -0,0 +1,275 @@ > >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later > > > > According to Documentation/process/license-rules.rst this should be: > > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ > > > > Same applies to other places in this patch. > > > > Actually, LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0 has GPL-2.0-or-later > as a valid license: > > Valid-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later > > Personally I very much prefer GPL-2.0-or-later since I think it is > much clearer. I saw feedback from Greg to use the SPDX style from Documentation/process/license-rules.rst. Please check: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/10/232