From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41794C04EBC for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 15:09:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C36223D0 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 15:09:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="G5vU9eWP" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 04C36223D0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729930AbeKMBDJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2018 20:03:09 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-f194.google.com ([209.85.167.194]:41820 "EHLO mail-oi1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726912AbeKMBDI (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2018 20:03:08 -0500 Received: by mail-oi1-f194.google.com with SMTP id g188-v6so7396885oif.8; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 07:09:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XewShTb8OK7Ia+MHfRiVu1VBL0Z96GKD2pViMG0gi1Q=; b=G5vU9eWPGgxV9GnYcYP4UJovDwnFeJT8WdXRROV+BapLaI36i5n/C/Ryfmh32n9VKk 9Yh97DoF44YWgtiFmeOspoHRYzN5jDVFZpmMnfG8bjBV7NBPbE8j8l426L12mupK5lLl KaZYT68upiSuXB6rm9rDSjxvKZE4AoD18QhK1NhHXKfJlV4sKpY/b5dfucHzVta+NhFl X0H0GKl+exnJl/w6P7i1w4ql7MQ49ruxPc7CISb8VJdZamB76H0dxcyjklOTZunL/r7+ wr0+Xmmnweksw+yJmOJks5wXJOGIF+ef4ZIR+st7OzGOIi6v+wEf+mMEae+9ZYWLo2YJ 2puQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XewShTb8OK7Ia+MHfRiVu1VBL0Z96GKD2pViMG0gi1Q=; b=AJUuA9WNW/BEO02SZNJ3NttCL7+3YfiIYrlUaEI4zqUH9FHdk680CnZvUX58U5coGp LUtClntgF5DLE7vzz4xdRV1qmsw8vQ5AxhI9Nfrrc8U7uUlMzzG5VNDEPt3pj+uDB2+6 clr7gsjBIx0u5oriBbedK/RtF0eAHJ5vJO1oYstc8AfXAUzlvoX71zwFjHpMJdqxksGM ruAxGI4Vtb2582KLocY7C8TRsSerCIIWYgq/cAKKc1gLP1rs/AChboFhbBEplORFrRnu zCBvDPIrPmRU8HYhS4Kj+Wbe3+qzF946ewgRUsmKnqTB4xbfYhKn6XDlb6pAaCIYXivR Ix7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIthApg1AHGvhWxq7QwvkNPcuesUhhHZQrvmw+7A3bi05oJUJ96 tgW2XWxRMhQc5+28mPJBWzz0YjKORxqIymC4nbg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fK0VK+RHGItRprNXN2FMhe3FsZ8CsQUETdJ1n4WxerPBmmgM+sWi1JWQWPODHB2sOs1I+OuuqT8LMDVyt3g8o= X-Received: by 2002:aca:308b:: with SMTP id w133-v6mr736370oiw.67.1542035368545; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 07:09:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1541871439-4882-1-git-send-email-martin@kaiser.cx> In-Reply-To: From: Fabio Estevam Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 13:09:26 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: imx: make sure that maps are fully initialized To: Dong Aisheng Cc: Martin Kaiser , Shawn Guo , Stefan Agner , Sascha Hauer , Linus Walleij , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , linux-kernel , Leonard Crestez Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Dong, On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 1:04 PM A.s. Dong wrote: > Thanks for reporting this issue. > The original code intended to save 3 common lines for both SCU and MMIO pads, > but it did change the code logic a bit which resulted in a regression specificly > for NO_PAD_CTL cases used on a few legacy boards. (NO_PAD_CTL is deprecated > for new boards dts). Just a clarification: NO_PAD_CTL is not deprecated. It is not recommended for new dts as we should not rely on the bootloader pinctrl settings. > As you both had a patch, i'm not sure who i'm going to expect for a updated one, > so I would send it my own with both of your tags. Yes, please send a patch putting a Reported-by tag from Martin and a Suggested-by tag from Leonard. Thanks