From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755285Ab2IFWpu (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2012 18:45:50 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com ([209.85.217.174]:50117 "EHLO mail-lb0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754318Ab2IFWpt (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2012 18:45:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <50492617.8030609@parallels.com> References: <50470A87.1040701@parallels.com> <20120905082947.GD3195@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com> <50470EBF.9070109@parallels.com> <20120905084740.GE3195@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com> <1346835993.2600.9.camel@twins> <20120905091140.GH3195@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com> <50471782.6060800@parallels.com> <1346837209.2600.14.camel@twins> <50471C0C.7050600@parallels.com> <1346840453.2461.6.camel@laptop> <20120906203839.GM29092@google.com> <50492617.8030609@parallels.com> Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:45:47 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: FuJJIO4uGRklWbGj2FwcVNJ0gVs Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] forced comounts for cgroups. From: Tejun Heo To: Glauber Costa Cc: Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, davej@redhat.com, ben@decadent.org.uk, pjt@google.com, lennart@poettering.net, kay.sievers@vrfy.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, Glauber. On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Glauber Costa wrote: > Yes, please. > > While you rightfully claim that you explained it a couple of times, it > all seems to be quite fuzzy. I don't blame it on you: the current state > of the interface leads to this. Heh, I drank two cups of coffee and two glasses of wine that evening. Coffee won and I couldn't sleep till around 4am with splitting headache. I'm not too confident about what I wrote that night. :) > So another detailed explanation of what you envision at this point, > considering the discussions we had in the previous days, would be really > helpful, Definitely, will do. Please give me a few days to sort through immediately pending stuff. Thanks. -- tejun