From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6062CC433E0 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 14:21:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41853216FD for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 14:21:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726941AbgFQOVX (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:21:23 -0400 Received: from mail-vs1-f65.google.com ([209.85.217.65]:34336 "EHLO mail-vs1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726329AbgFQOVW (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:21:22 -0400 Received: by mail-vs1-f65.google.com with SMTP id q2so1492092vsr.1; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 07:21:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ERGqcQ7t8WT4ifOpQtED2cQLgSQqRg45Jtc+jpL/R/s=; b=toAClvRvSBV0LPW/IdJ972hNRe3Kgela9tPIBMfcBd774zNapT/ua5FCA0vvI10bpP jRbPiosS9NW6WSx48r48b431a2g9hqOQUluFGCeCa1tGRfdA/4bYZgj6eygGvTXmhtFt pDSXmWH8GOhZtmafLy7K2cyQMqVCOzYFLiLcGBJnMtp5BIO28Mh8Ui3lIOyalYOpefB9 td+jceWWuTLm1Ompc2ngrs+aYeBaohhxAVcFD5/QAUBgwv1UAkq90/b6VEEB55WSh9C3 BKt82uDAwz/8oNKV5d80odkqjtkiBvQcEf9wcN9FLAGDGbAA48VzntJTIUwN30+xmFcj J+5w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530r41Dl7gaEL5PEpKT7IJvZXrs1CoHa37BBf12DGv1Mvi9+DFna OtlLunI/tcxGbnpRDUWAlNIf7B5jZcrlYydNkDo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxUB28eId7C069Z9yU5wnQSTxhlhjJBmlSA6lDeLgkW8xYFy5G701t2YSWHVSEGhHywz7FhjlBV+Vo9znzTuNM= X-Received: by 2002:a67:e90e:: with SMTP id c14mr6182478vso.185.1592403680997; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 07:21:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200605162518.28099-1-florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> <6b1f0668-572e-ae52-27e6-c897bab4204c@gmail.com> <0c0ba84e-4b2d-53ac-5092-40312ecba13b@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <0c0ba84e-4b2d-53ac-5092-40312ecba13b@gmail.com> From: Michael Ira Krufky Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:21:08 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH stable 4.9 00/21] Unbreak 32-bit DVB applications on 64-bit kernels To: Florian Fainelli Cc: LKML , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Shuah Khan , Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro , Jaedon Shin , Colin Ian King , Katsuhiro Suzuki , Satendra Singh Thakur , "open list:MEDIA INPUT INFRASTRUCTURE (V4L/DVB)" , "open list:FILESYSTEMS (VFS and infrastructure)" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hey Florian, Thank you for the time and effort that you put into this patch series. I was excited to see this, when I first saw it posted a few weeks ago. I have every intention of giving it a review, but just haven't found the time yet. I'm sure that Mauro would say the same. I'm sure that he and I both will find some time, hopefully over the next few weeks or sooner, to give this a thorough review and provide some feedback. Hopefully we can put this on its way for merge soon. Please bear with us.. Thanks again for your contribution. -Mike Krufky On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 12:39 AM Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > > On 6/11/2020 9:45 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > > > > On 6/5/2020 9:24 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> This long patch series was motivated by backporting Jaedon's changes > >> which add a proper ioctl compatibility layer for 32-bit applications > >> running on 64-bit kernels. We have a number of Android TV-based products > >> currently running on the 4.9 kernel and this was broken for them. > >> > >> Thanks to Robert McConnell for identifying and providing the patches in > >> their initial format. > >> > >> In order for Jaedon's patches to apply cleanly a number of changes were > >> applied to support those changes. If you deem the patch series too big > >> please let me know. > > > > Mauro, can you review this? I would prefer not to maintain those patches > > in our downstream 4.9 kernel as there are quite a few of them, and this > > is likely beneficial to other people. > > Hello? Anybody here? > -- > Florian