From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD135C43441 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:33:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 755F62081C for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:33:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="mIDbuzh9" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 755F62081C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lixom.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726661AbeKKDSx (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Nov 2018 22:18:53 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-f67.google.com ([209.85.166.67]:47065 "EHLO mail-io1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726244AbeKKDSx (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Nov 2018 22:18:53 -0500 Received: by mail-io1-f67.google.com with SMTP id y22-v6so3487243ioj.13 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 09:33:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lIXvBXOlZQMyGtiKoQxO18AiSmChEBS7m0aX4KP3rXo=; b=mIDbuzh9nLGJmMo9QyRRzni35eAc1Q8XgPaw+o4N62aTOmNWfhMoOP2BfJzhbImSYo tnOCwoy2NrfoyWRbvZ9lh750M4TzI0CMY8HS8lP+mwcE6folFY9Of+1WGSNn45Vl4VWN db7wo8TSOcFRlitPu+jwe65voLEUgdksYllwzrjXwX4+B5PLpgeHva/1tmPgpVgK+ttU napMc192LlwMaKbeGsvuA8ihTfmt6SKr6zcwRkD4O4QjUxbg/LiNxb3zMjSTVLwHSiw1 hWYNteNaRSgKgas6uF7mt0yZjRkYbtjTGVt+/V/y1NxcrAt9FrJPU9Enxc0GvNjB1lKF /7fw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lIXvBXOlZQMyGtiKoQxO18AiSmChEBS7m0aX4KP3rXo=; b=e+KbZcWprSF3EojDNyUd60LqSJUwcd1IYGLHtR8brsnkttHYEduuCeY+TmAuDJ1ny5 8FBt84Pv+4fzRBE8Elp8l57a8pzKS51gQkG8QsEOp1T7HfSMkenHn/rrBMpXgN9DXEho XIcTghTgAANqvHBIz5Jcig2Nef0vTk9/XCSuL1g/HmD0vvkUZQ0XYU95wmUYl9/+ikVn RoyFCYvxzrE2FnPtxUzpXUMxF98mEmVhRB1vRIGx4j/pY8xekXui9bgfUG/4iiLlbwiH zCjHifgxg7EGUrjEil1XcittBzjWNma50m43aHGQno+Qwyav6rydqoySBWkkYzxeNJrb k6Vg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJSX22EMLftUxPfJfN/msTvKzm4mltZdOtGTLlmTO707ap8ErsR 3vnSxklIFDX9QFVv57/R1f71rIFf2YrUolrA69K7WQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fuOipbhx2PcJACDChKMIaVf2Kr31EkkOnc68jhMjzBjhthmpJUSghVQ3qDy1Wz7aGzQxXyyMidXO2owK1pWbI= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:1414:: with SMTP id 20mr515613iou.140.1541871187418; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 09:33:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <898e79a6-092c-d013-d2bb-f6260e761379@free.fr> <03f41ca8-68c6-f075-cb1e-c7f630a3b128@free.fr> <20181108093617.GB8433@e107155-lin> <3f5ff18e-a264-981d-505f-69636fcf4355@free.fr> In-Reply-To: From: Olof Johansson Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 09:32:55 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] arm64: defconfig: Drop ARM_BIG_LITTLE_CPUFREQ To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: marc.w.gonzalez@free.fr, Sudeep Holla , ARM-SoC Maintainers , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux ARM Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 8:05 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On 11/10/18, Marc Gonzalez wrote: > > On 10/11/2018 09:57, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 10:36 AM Sudeep Holla > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 11:39:42PM +0100, Marc Gonzalez wrote: > >>>> Commit a7314405d83c ("drop ARM_BIG_LITTLE_CPUFREQ support for ARM64") > >>>> dropped ARM_BIG_LITTLE_CPUFREQ support for ARM64. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Looks good, > >>> > >>> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla > >>> > >>> But I left it intentionally to avoid churn assuming it will go away when > >>> ARM SoC team runs savedefconfig and sync the defconfig. > >> > >> I would never do that, > > > > Isn't that what commit c432c0880596 did? :-p > > Olof did that one ;-) Yeah, it was because of churn caused by things moving over many releases. In the end, it's documenting what the kernel builds anyway. We don't do it often, I think this was the first time in recent memory. -Olof