From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,T_DKIMWL_WL_MED, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1280CC468C7 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 21:46:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE66720852 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 21:46:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="00eciaUM" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AE66720852 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lixom.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390550AbeGKVxL (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2018 17:53:11 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f66.google.com ([209.85.215.66]:41578 "EHLO mail-lf0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387509AbeGKVxL (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2018 17:53:11 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-f66.google.com with SMTP id v22-v6so8981892lfe.8 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:46:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fqTF+EgZjanyU5IYIAjaOCBA52D77FN66Xy66NuvqGg=; b=00eciaUMPTIwqJIxgHqqL/CkrmOElsS2GIxjkYjwM83jORiiSct2IxrrTW6tz1RypC BFlrORk6WVS9kGeoEsJkCYcm/JpyVCm2SvVrX4kFWY/FCqiwp4abMTEPZl/dIoKsYgsi VkS4aX2Bmvu0LD4DCBdA7hVUi0IAr8UTa9hLv1n7cfcmuiX11pw+OofpzkcflqH7pAP+ nNolp8xsqIuJxDsfNmCT1nbLaLqT5vaqnxocdm55QfYl28LJuPhsbh6jZEw0QA1nulhT IWT+2ZLDRN/0nVf593vSqC9gGCCfD3H33MlFoXmH/R4T2azsWNiRaTq7sPQCk2UI5Pof diPg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fqTF+EgZjanyU5IYIAjaOCBA52D77FN66Xy66NuvqGg=; b=qvTripAbedoHHaptAbigbUyqB3sBrkWMDMPrHGDtpbQqRJU34X0tPb8Dr6fZSy3Z+4 zB6Li00MNkf6oeupXbwoJSlRMH8+W5g5tEEgWJ/ylM6Yv9oqefesVwJKK3cMX/4QPeU4 rzYJ1/Ox/fJgtk4fIdT4amIZBOlcSTXDxXjNwL2fEyzbkzJq8jl8H1mXPtMbAF+detvE QY+Ttpfomxn7GAwNBB8GEwePUTRVZKEtUU3dQrW2J1whqarLwKJRAKXm1lmv7oLUzMvz 0Jmwd8JEu0HZUr3qWpdeWW763kaBqmmpI3ftFYTg7o+HkKFM9wwnKgPwSPAEVxMgFrlF f+Eg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlEmO9DrTvScijIaXmzvpnEF5uvGd14w+/A65jyzn6nqvSaepq0d UbHQbOSiEEla0GKXtI5gXA93HkdQccCH7aoz65Zbhw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpeUZ+5fkn8bTMFVSCyA6w5d6wapWj1tuXI8AQd2s1Kasa7P+y6k3au5EPgCnxqvzIA5SMH53PQ6et1KI0QjZRQ= X-Received: by 2002:a19:138b:: with SMTP id 11-v6mr226069lft.74.1531345609263; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:46:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a19:fc1c:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:46:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [2620:10d:c090:200::7:2a56] In-Reply-To: <20180711142649.4556-1-geert+renesas@glider.be> References: <20180711142649.4556-1-geert+renesas@glider.be> From: Olof Johansson Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:46:47 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: defconfig: Set CONFIG_LOCALVERSION in multi v4t/v5/v7 defconfigs To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Russell King , Arnd Bergmann , Kevin Hilman , Linux ARM Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 7:26 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > This allows to derive the kernel flavor from the kernel version at > runtime. > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven I prefer not to have this go in -- this is extremely likely to creep into derivative configs and as such it would have no value (you can't be sure it's still the same config). /proc/config.gz is the way to keep track of exactly what config you're running anyway, right? -Olof