From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932812Ab2AKPJf (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:09:35 -0500 Received: from mail-yw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]:34002 "EHLO mail-yw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932340Ab2AKPJe (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:09:34 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [173.13.129.225] In-Reply-To: <201201111450.02798.arnd@arndb.de> References: <20120111133146.990e2b7115c9fa80e8fc3234@canb.auug.org.au> <4F0D65F6.8080209@infradead.org> <201201111450.02798.arnd@arndb.de> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 07:09:33 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb tree with the arm-soc tree From: Olof Johansson To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Guennadi Liakhovetski , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Nicolas Ferre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > I'll drop the remaining atmel patches from my next/drivers2 branch and let > Nicolas send me a new rebased pull request for 3.4. The patches in question > look simple enough, but if the developers can't get a simple dependency right > after discussing it for weeks, I'd rather not take it this time. Sounds good to me. -Olof