From: Jonas Gorski <jogo@openwrt.org>
To: Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
MTD Maling List <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: brcmnand: Workaround false ECC uncorrectable errors
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 21:44:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOiHx=mLmEW=gK_HE6oVqaFZjMUAWoP1PxZchc_mC_A5PJn-Cw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <565F51D2.4010204@simon.arlott.org.uk>
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> wrote:
> On 01/12/15 10:41, Jonas Gorski wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> wrote:
>>> +
>>> + /* Go to start of buffer */
>>> + buf -= FC_WORDS;
>>> +
>>> + /* Erased if all data bytes are 0xFF */
>>> + buf_erased = memchr_inv(buf, 0xFF, FC_WORDS) == NULL;
>>> +
>>> + if (!buf_erased)
>>> + goto out_free;
>>
>> We now have a function exactly for that use case in 4.4,
>> nand_check_erased_buf [1], consider using that. This also has the
>> benefit of treating bit flips as correctable as long as the ECC scheme
>> is strong enough.
>
> I have no idea whether or not it's appropriate to specify
> bitflips_threshold > 0 so it'd just be a more complex way to do
> a memchr_inv() search for 0xFF.
The threshold would be the amount of bitflips the code can correct, so
basically ecc.strength (at least that is my understanding).
> The code also has to check for the hamming code bytes being all 0x00,
> because according to the comments [2], the controller also has
> difficulty with the non-erased all-0xFFs scenario too.
According to brcmnand.c hamming can fix up to fifteen bitflips, but in
the current code you would fail a hamming protected all-0xff-page for
even a single bitflip in the data or in the ecc bytes, which means
that all-0xff-pages wouldn't be protected at all.
Jonas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-02 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-28 19:23 [PATCH] mtd: brcmnand: Workaround false ECC uncorrectable errors Simon Arlott
2015-12-01 10:41 ` Jonas Gorski
2015-12-02 20:17 ` Simon Arlott
2015-12-02 20:44 ` Jonas Gorski [this message]
2015-12-02 20:54 ` Brian Norris
2015-12-02 21:06 ` Brian Norris
2015-12-02 21:08 ` Jonas Gorski
2015-12-02 21:29 ` Simon Arlott
2015-12-02 22:22 ` Brian Norris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAOiHx=mLmEW=gK_HE6oVqaFZjMUAWoP1PxZchc_mC_A5PJn-Cw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jogo@openwrt.org \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kdasu.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=simon@fire.lp0.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).