From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752160AbeBZHrZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Feb 2018 02:47:25 -0500 Received: from mail-qt0-f171.google.com ([209.85.216.171]:36883 "EHLO mail-qt0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751014AbeBZHrW (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Feb 2018 02:47:22 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvidInK4kS+lBnTwzIAqaq+A7nV5SVc1SoTdF6lgYd4dsGj1NB3IVzLJVw7P55HnlOXgJTiJf+jdus9eeBeDNA= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87mv004p0t.fsf@xmission.com> References: <878tbmf5vl.fsf@xmission.com> <20180221202908.17258-4-ebiederm@xmission.com> <87inao6dfa.fsf@xmission.com> <87mv004p0t.fsf@xmission.com> From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 08:47:21 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] fuse: Ensure posix acls are translated outside of init_user_ns To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: lkml , Linux Containers , linux-fsdevel , Alban Crequy , Seth Forshee , Sargun Dhillon , Dongsu Park , "Serge E. Hallyn" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 11:50 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > So if we could figure out how to use the generic acl support for the old > brand of fuse filesystems that don't set FUSE_POSIX_ACL it would be much > easier to support them long term. Simplest and most robust way seems to be to do everything the same (as with FUSE_POSIX_ACL) but tell the vfs not to cache the acl. Thanks, Miklos