Re: [PATCH] sysinfo: include availram field in sysinfo struct

[Pintu Agarwal <pintu.ping@gmail.com>]

On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 at 23:12, David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com> wrote:
>
> From: Pintu Agarwal
> > Sent: 06 January 2022 16:50
> >
> > On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 at 21:41, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 09:04:10PM +0530, Pintu Kumar wrote:
> > > > The sysinfo member does not have any "available ram" field and
> > > > the bufferram field is not much helpful either, to get a rough
> > > > estimate of available ram needed for allocation.
> > > >
> > > > One needs to parse MemAvailable field separately from /proc/meminfo
> > > > to get this info instead of directly getting if from sysinfo itself.
> > > >
> > > > Thus, this patch introduce a new field as availram in sysinfo
> > > > so that all the info total/free/available can be retrieved from
> > > > one place itself.
> > > >
> > > > There are couple of places in kernel as well where this can be improved.
> > > > For example:
> > > > In fs/proc/meminfo.c:
> > > > meminfo_proc_show:
> > > >    si_meminfo(&i);
> > > >    available = si_mem_available();
> > > > Now with this change the second call be avoided.
> > > > Thus, we can directly do:
> > > > show_val_kb(m, "MemAvailable:   ", i.availram);
> > > >
> > > > Note, this also requires update in procfs for free and other commands.
> > > > Like in free command as well we frist call sysinfo then again parse
> > > > /proc/meminfo to get available field.
> > > > This can be avoided too with higher kernel version.
> > > >
> > > > A sample output with single sysinfo call is shown below:
> > > > Total RAM: 248376 kB
> > > >  Free RAM: 231540 kB
> > > > Avail RAM: 230448 kB
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Pintu Kumar <quic_pintu@quicinc.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Pintu Agarwal <pintu.ping@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  include/uapi/linux/sysinfo.h | 1 +
> > > >  kernel/sys.c                 | 4 ++++
> > > >  mm/page_alloc.c              | 2 ++
> > > >  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/sysinfo.h b/include/uapi/linux/sysinfo.h
> > > > index 435d5c2..6e77e90 100644
> > > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/sysinfo.h
> > > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/sysinfo.h
> > > > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ struct sysinfo {
> > > >       __kernel_ulong_t freeram;       /* Available memory size */
> > > >       __kernel_ulong_t sharedram;     /* Amount of shared memory */
> > > >       __kernel_ulong_t bufferram;     /* Memory used by buffers */
> > > > +     __kernel_ulong_t availram;      /* Memory available for allocation */
> > > >       __kernel_ulong_t totalswap;     /* Total swap space size */
> > > >       __kernel_ulong_t freeswap;      /* swap space still available */
> > > >       __u16 procs;                    /* Number of current processes */
> > >
> > > Hi! Sorry, but I don't understand -- the sysinfo structure seems to
> > > be part of user API, no? Don't we break it up here?
> >
> > Yes, the corresponding user space header /usr/include/linux/sysinfo.h
> > also needs to be updated.
> > When we generate the kernel header it will be updated automatically.
>
> You can't add a field in the middle of a UAPI structure.
> It breaks compatibility for old binaries.
>
> Depending on the interface definition you may be able to add one at the end.
>
oh okay thank you for your feedback. I will move to the end and check again.
But my doubt is, whether I should move before this
char _f[20-2*sizeof(__kernel_ulong_t)-sizeof(__u32)];
or after this ?

Also, I could not understand what this is for ?
Do we need to update this since sture is changed ?