linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Paul Clarke <pc@us.ibm.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] perf test: Improve pmu event metric testing
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 13:29:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fXg6T0mcX=qJaXz-O_gQ1hmgxw+YaFiNoLTkogMB_gBfQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200513153929.GH5583@kernel.org>

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 8:39 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<arnaldo.melo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Em Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:27:52PM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> > Break pmu-events test into 2 and add a test to verify that all pmu metric
> > expressions simply parse. Try to parse all metric ids/events, warning if
> > metrics for the current architecture fail to parse.
> >
> > Tested on power9, skylakex, haswell, broadwell, westmere, sandybridge and
> > ivybridge with the patch set in place.
> > May fail on other architectures if metrics are invalid. In particular s390
> > is untested, but its expressions are trivial. The event encodings could
> > be wrong but are only warned about. The untested architectures with
> > expressions are power8, cascadelakex, tremontx, skylake, jaketown, ivytown
> > and variants of haswell and broadwell.
> >
> > v2. changes the commit message as event parsing errors no longer cause
> > the test to fail.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c |   5 +
> >  tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c   | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  tools/perf/tests/tests.h        |   2 +
> >  3 files changed, 159 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
> > index 3471ec52ea11..8147c17c71ab 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
> > @@ -75,6 +75,11 @@ static struct test generic_tests[] = {
> >       {
> >               .desc = "PMU events",
> >               .func = test__pmu_events,
> > +             .subtest = {
> > +                     .get_nr         = test__pmu_events_subtest_get_nr,
> > +                     .get_desc       = test__pmu_events_subtest_get_desc,
> > +             },
> > +
> >       },
> >       {
> >               .desc = "DSO data read",
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c b/tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c
> > index d64261da8bf7..c18b9ce8cace 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c
> > @@ -8,6 +8,10 @@
> >  #include <linux/zalloc.h>
> >  #include "debug.h"
> >  #include "../pmu-events/pmu-events.h"
> > +#include "util/evlist.h"
> > +#include "util/expr.h"
> > +#include "util/parse-events.h"
> > +#include <ctype.h>
>
> historically we have been using a ctype.h we got from the git tool
> repository, its in:
>
>   tools/include/linux/ctype.h
>
> [acme@five perf]$ find tools/perf/ -name "*.[ch]" | xargs grep '<linux/ctype.h>' | wc -l
> 39
> [acme@five perf]$ find tools/perf/ -name "*.[ch]" | xargs grep '<ctype.h>' | wc -l
> 2
> [acme@five perf]$
>
> [acme@five perf]$ find tools/perf/ -name "*.[ch]" | xargs grep '<ctype.h>'
> tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c:#include <ctype.h>
> tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-perl.c:#include <ctype.h>
> [acme@five perf]$

Thanks, done.

> >  struct perf_pmu_test_event {
> >       struct pmu_event event;
> > @@ -144,7 +148,7 @@ static struct pmu_events_map *__test_pmu_get_events_map(void)
> >  }
> >
> >  /* Verify generated events from pmu-events.c is as expected */
> > -static int __test_pmu_event_table(void)
> > +static int test_pmu_event_table(void)
> >  {
> >       struct pmu_events_map *map = __test_pmu_get_events_map();
> >       struct pmu_event *table;
> > @@ -347,14 +351,11 @@ static int __test__pmu_event_aliases(char *pmu_name, int *count)
> >       return res;
> >  }
> >
> > -int test__pmu_events(struct test *test __maybe_unused,
> > -                  int subtest __maybe_unused)
> > +
> > +static int test_aliases(void)
> >  {
> >       struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
> >
> > -     if (__test_pmu_event_table())
> > -             return -1;
> > -
> >       while ((pmu = perf_pmu__scan(pmu)) != NULL) {
> >               int count = 0;
> >
> > @@ -377,3 +378,148 @@ int test__pmu_events(struct test *test __maybe_unused,
> >
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> > +
> > +static bool is_number(const char *str)
> > +{
> > +     size_t i;
> > +
> > +     for (i = 0; i < strlen(str); i++) {
> > +             if (!isdigit(str[i]) && str[i] != '.')
> > +                     return false;
> > +     }
> > +     return true;
> > +}
>
> The above can still get some wrong numbers, can't we instead use
> strtold() and check its return value?

Done with strtod to avoid debates on 80-bit vs 128-bit long doubles.
Fwiw, I'd done it this way as conversion from TMA_Metrics.xlsx
sometimes yields a number as .5 rather than 0.5 which causes strtod to
choke. Checking on:
https://download.01.org/perfmon/
The csv isn't doing this (Intel feature request, can we get a tsv as
the comma in a csv is naively matched with commas in min, max and
other expressions) and presumably we can fix any xls conversion
script.

> > +static int check_parse_id(const char *id, bool same_cpu, struct pmu_event *pe)
> > +{
> > +     struct parse_events_error error;
> > +     struct evlist *evlist;
> > +     int ret;
> > +
> > +     /* Numbers are always valid. */
> > +     if (is_number(id))
> > +             return 0;
> > +
> > +     evlist = evlist__new();
> > +     memset(&error, 0, sizeof(error));
> > +     ret = parse_events(evlist, id, &error);
> > +     if (ret && same_cpu) {
> > +             fprintf(stderr,
> > +                     "\nWARNING: Parse event failed metric '%s' id '%s' expr '%s'\n",
> > +                     pe->metric_name, id, pe->metric_expr);
> > +             fprintf(stderr, "Error string '%s' help '%s'\n",
> > +                     error.str, error.help);
>
> Can we pr_warning() above to be consistent with using pr_debug3(), right
> in the else branch?
>
> > +     } else if (ret) {
> > +             pr_debug3("Parse event failed, but for an event that may not be supported by this CPU.\nid '%s' metric '%s' expr '%s'\n",
> > +                     id, pe->metric_name, pe->metric_expr);
> > +     }
> > +     evlist__delete(evlist);
> > +     free(error.str);
> > +     free(error.help);
> > +     free(error.first_str);
> > +     free(error.first_help);
> > +     /* TODO: too many metrics are broken to fail on this test currently. */
> > +     return 0;
>
> I was thinking if we could handle the failure of this specific
> check_parse_id() in its caller differently and then, at the end, use
> some marking like with:
>
> 58: builtin clang support                                 : Skip (not compiled in)
>
> Perhaps:
>
> NN: Parsing of PMU event table metrics                    : Skip (Some metrics failed)
>
> Or some other wording, perhaps a new return value in addition to skip,
> fail, ok. That allows the test to continue but flags it as having issues
> that should be checked with 'perf test -v'

I've added a subtest helper that gives a reason for a skip, similar to
get_desc, this avoids changing all the test function parameters and is
ignored if not initialized.

Thanks,
Ian

> > +}
> > +
> > +static int test_parsing(void)
> > +{
> > +     struct pmu_events_map *cpus_map = perf_pmu__find_map(NULL);
> > +     struct pmu_events_map *map;
> > +     struct pmu_event *pe;
> > +     int i, j, k;
> > +     const char **ids;
> > +     int idnum;
> > +     int ret = 0;
> > +     struct expr_parse_ctx ctx;
> > +     double result;
> > +
> > +     i = 0;
> > +     for (;;) {
> > +             map = &pmu_events_map[i++];
> > +             if (!map->table) {
> > +                     map = NULL;
> > +                     break;
> > +             }
> > +             j = 0;
> > +             for (;;) {
> > +                     pe = &map->table[j++];
> > +                     if (!pe->name && !pe->metric_group && !pe->metric_name)
> > +                             break;
> > +                     if (!pe->metric_expr)
> > +                             continue;
> > +                     if (expr__find_other(pe->metric_expr, NULL,
> > +                                             &ids, &idnum, 0) < 0) {
> > +                             pr_debug("Parse other failed for map %s %s %s\n",
> > +                                     map->cpuid, map->version, map->type);
> > +                             pr_debug("On metric %s\n", pe->metric_name);
> > +                             pr_debug("On expression %s\n", pe->metric_expr);
> > +                             ret++;
> > +                             continue;
> > +                     }
> > +                     expr__ctx_init(&ctx);
> > +
> > +                     /*
> > +                      * Add all ids with a made up value. The value may
> > +                      * trigger divide by zero when subtracted and so try to
> > +                      * make them unique.
> > +                      */
> > +                     for (k = 0; k < idnum; k++)
> > +                             expr__add_id(&ctx, ids[k], k + 1);
> > +
> > +                     for (k = 0; k < idnum; k++) {
> > +                             if (check_parse_id(ids[k], map == cpus_map, pe))
> > +                                     ret++;
> > +                     }
> > +
> > +                     if (expr__parse(&result, &ctx, pe->metric_expr, 0)) {
> > +                             pr_debug("Parse failed for map %s %s %s\n",
> > +                                     map->cpuid, map->version, map->type);
> > +                             pr_debug("On metric %s\n", pe->metric_name);
> > +                             pr_debug("On expression %s\n", pe->metric_expr);
> > +                             ret++;
> > +                     }
> > +                     for (k = 0; k < idnum; k++)
> > +                             zfree(&ids[k]);
> > +                     free(ids);
> > +             }
> > +     }
> > +     return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct {
> > +     int (*func)(void);
> > +     const char *desc;
> > +} pmu_events_testcase_table[] = {
> > +     {
> > +             .func = test_pmu_event_table,
> > +             .desc = "PMU event table sanity",
> > +     },
> > +     {
> > +             .func = test_aliases,
> > +             .desc = "PMU event map aliases",
> > +     },
> > +     {
> > +             .func = test_parsing,
> > +             .desc = "Parsing of PMU event table metrics",
> > +     },
> > +};
> > +
> > +const char *test__pmu_events_subtest_get_desc(int i)
> > +{
> > +     if (i < 0 || i >= (int)ARRAY_SIZE(pmu_events_testcase_table))
> > +             return NULL;
> > +     return pmu_events_testcase_table[i].desc;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int test__pmu_events_subtest_get_nr(void)
> > +{
> > +     return (int)ARRAY_SIZE(pmu_events_testcase_table);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int test__pmu_events(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int i)
> > +{
> > +     if (i < 0 || i >= (int)ARRAY_SIZE(pmu_events_testcase_table))
> > +             return TEST_FAIL;
> > +     return pmu_events_testcase_table[i].func();
> > +}
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/tests.h b/tools/perf/tests/tests.h
> > index d6d4ac34eeb7..8e316c30ed3c 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/tests/tests.h
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/tests.h
> > @@ -50,6 +50,8 @@ int test__perf_evsel__tp_sched_test(struct test *test, int subtest);
> >  int test__syscall_openat_tp_fields(struct test *test, int subtest);
> >  int test__pmu(struct test *test, int subtest);
> >  int test__pmu_events(struct test *test, int subtest);
> > +const char *test__pmu_events_subtest_get_desc(int subtest);
> > +int test__pmu_events_subtest_get_nr(void);
> >  int test__attr(struct test *test, int subtest);
> >  int test__dso_data(struct test *test, int subtest);
> >  int test__dso_data_cache(struct test *test, int subtest);
> > --
> > 2.26.2.645.ge9eca65c58-goog
> >
>
> --
>
> - Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-13 20:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-13  6:27 [PATCH v2 1/2] perf expr: Test parsing of floating point numbers Ian Rogers
2020-05-13  6:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] perf test: Improve pmu event metric testing Ian Rogers
2020-05-13 15:39   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-05-13 20:29     ` Ian Rogers [this message]
2020-05-13 15:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] perf expr: Test parsing of floating point numbers Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAP-5=fXg6T0mcX=qJaXz-O_gQ1hmgxw+YaFiNoLTkogMB_gBfQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=pc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).