From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1765896AbcINV6F (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 14 Sep 2016 17:58:05 -0400
Received: from mail-vk0-f67.google.com ([209.85.213.67]:36125 "EHLO
        mail-vk0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1753312AbcINV6E (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 14 Sep 2016 17:58:04 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <57D9C54B.3010105@linux.intel.com>
References: <1473886902-17902-1-git-send-email-khuey@kylehuey.com>
 <1473886902-17902-2-git-send-email-khuey@kylehuey.com> <57D9C139.1000601@linux.intel.com>
 <CAP045Aoy0dHAFMQgeYanowef8Ye1UgzRp6_tGbr80ONSfKyvbw@mail.gmail.com> <57D9C54B.3010105@linux.intel.com>
From: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:56:58 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP045ArGrKbA9U-VPEwMcQVXn22Z5VyKDMYiXK2YzZZi2xhFeA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] syscalls,x86 Expose arch_prctl on x86-32.
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@kernel.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>,
        Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
        Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
        "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" 
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Dave Hansen
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 09/14/2016 02:35 PM, Kyle Huey wrote:
>> It's not quite a plain move.  To leave the existing arch_prctls only
>> accessible to 64 bit callers, I added the is_32 bit and the four early
>> returns for each existing ARCH_BLAH.  These cases are now
>> conditionally compiled out in a 32 bit kernel, so we only have to
>> handle the 32 bit process on a 64 bit kernel case at runtime.
>
> I think it would make a lot of sense to do the move and the modification
> in two patches.

Ok.

> Oh, and arch_prctl() really *is* 64-bit only.  I didn't realize that.
> That would have been nice to call out in the changelog, too.  It's
> totally non-obvious.

Ok.

> You're going to owe some manpage updates after this too, I guess.  It
> says: "arch_prctl() is supported only on Linux/x86-64 for 64-bit
> programs currently."

Indeed. There's a patch at the end of the series (sent to LKML, but
you're not directly CCd on it) with a suggested manpage patch.

> FWIW, I don't think it would be horrible to leave the existing
> do_arch_prctl() code in process_64.h and call it
> do_64_bit_only_something_arch_prctl(), and only call in to it from the
> generic do_arch_prctl().  You really have one reason for all the "if
> (is_32)"'s and it would be nice to document why in one single place.

Yeah, that seems like a good idea.

- Kyle