From: "Lev R. Oshvang ." <levonshe@gmail.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Aleksa Sarai" <cyphar@cyphar.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Al Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
"Christian Heimes" <christian@python.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Deven Bowers" <deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com>,
"Eric Chiang" <ericchiang@google.com>,
"Florian Weimer" <fweimer@redhat.com>,
"James Morris" <jmorris@namei.org>, "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
"Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Lakshmi Ramasubramanian" <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
"Matthew Garrett" <mjg59@google.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox" <willy@infradead.org>,
"Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
"Mickaël Salaün" <mickael.salaun@ssi.gouv.fr>,
"Mimi Zohar" <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
"Philippe Trébuchet" <philippe.trebuchet@ssi.gouv.fr>,
"Scott Shell" <scottsh@microsoft.com>,
"Sean Christopherson" <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"Steve Dower" <steve.dower@python.org>,
"Steve Grubb" <sgrubb@redhat.com>,
"Thibaut Sautereau" <thibaut.sautereau@ssi.gouv.fr>,
"Vincent Strubel" <vincent.strubel@ssi.gouv.fr>,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
"LSM List" <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] fs: Add a MAY_EXECMOUNT flag to infer the noexec mount property
Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 19:57:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP22eLEy5nc4u6gPHtY56afrvF9oTNBwRwNAc7Le=Y_8V49nqQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202005140845.16F1CDC@keescook>
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 6:48 PM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:14:04AM +0300, Lev R. Oshvang . wrote:
> > New sysctl is indeed required to allow userspace that places scripts
> > or libs under noexec mounts.
>
> But since this is a not-uncommon environment, we must have the sysctl
> otherwise this change would break those systems.
>
But I proposed sysctl on a line below.
> > fs.mnt_noexec_strict =1 (allow, e) , 1 (deny any file with --x
> > permission), 2 (deny when O_MAYEXEC absent), for any file with ---x
> > permissions)
>
> I don't think we want another mount option -- this is already fully
> expressed with noexec and the system-wide sysctl.
>
> --
The intended use of proposed sysctl is to ebable sysadmin to decide
whar is desired semantics mount with NO_EXEC option.
fs.mnt_noexec_scope =0 |1|2|3
0 - means old behaviour i.e do nor run executables and scripts (default)
1 - deny any file with --x permissions, i.e executables , script and libs
2 - deny any file when O_MAYEXEC is present.
I think this is enough to handle all use cases and to not break
current sysadmin file mounts setting
I oppose the new O_MAY_EXECMOUNT flag, kernel already has MNT_NO_EXEC,
SB_NOEXEC and SB_I_NOEXEC and I frankly do not understand why so many
variants exist.
Lev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-17 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-05 15:31 [PATCH v5 0/6] Add support for O_MAYEXEC Mickaël Salaün
2020-05-05 15:31 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] fs: Add support for an O_MAYEXEC flag on openat2(2) Mickaël Salaün
2020-05-12 21:05 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-12 21:40 ` Christian Heimes
2020-05-12 22:56 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-13 10:13 ` Mickaël Salaün
2020-05-05 15:31 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] fs: Add a MAY_EXECMOUNT flag to infer the noexec mount property Mickaël Salaün
2020-05-12 21:09 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-14 8:14 ` Lev R. Oshvang .
2020-05-14 15:48 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-17 16:57 ` Lev R. Oshvang . [this message]
2020-05-05 15:31 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] fs: Enable to enforce noexec mounts or file exec through O_MAYEXEC Mickaël Salaün
2020-05-05 15:44 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-05-05 16:55 ` Mickaël Salaün
2020-05-05 17:40 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-05-12 21:48 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-13 11:09 ` Mickaël Salaün
2020-05-13 15:37 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-05-13 23:27 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-14 3:05 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-14 10:12 ` David Laight
2020-05-14 12:22 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-05-14 14:41 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-14 15:52 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-05-14 15:45 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-14 16:10 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-05-14 19:16 ` Mickaël Salaün
2020-05-15 0:58 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-05-15 8:01 ` How about just O_EXEC? (was Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] fs: Enable to enforce noexec mounts or file exec through O_MAYEXEC) Kees Cook
2020-05-15 8:43 ` Florian Weimer
2020-05-15 14:37 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-15 14:43 ` Florian Weimer
2020-05-15 15:50 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-18 7:26 ` Florian Weimer
2020-05-19 2:23 ` Aleksa Sarai
2020-05-19 10:13 ` Mickaël Salaün
2020-05-15 11:04 ` Mickaël Salaün
2020-05-15 15:46 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-15 18:24 ` Mickaël Salaün
2020-05-14 19:21 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] fs: Enable to enforce noexec mounts or file exec through O_MAYEXEC Mickaël Salaün
2020-05-05 15:31 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] selftest/openat2: Add tests for O_MAYEXEC enforcing Mickaël Salaün
2020-05-12 21:57 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-13 11:18 ` Mickaël Salaün
2020-05-05 15:31 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] doc: Add documentation for the fs.open_mayexec_enforce sysctl Mickaël Salaün
2020-05-12 22:00 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-13 11:20 ` Mickaël Salaün
2020-05-05 15:31 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] ima: add policy support for the new file open MAY_OPENEXEC flag Mickaël Salaün
2020-05-05 15:36 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] Add support for O_MAYEXEC Mickaël Salaün
2020-05-06 13:58 ` Lev R. Oshvang .
2020-05-06 15:41 ` Aleksa Sarai
2020-05-07 8:30 ` Mickaël Salaün
2020-05-07 8:05 ` David Laight
2020-05-07 8:36 ` Mickaël Salaün
2020-05-07 9:00 ` David Laight
2020-05-07 9:30 ` Mickaël Salaün
2020-05-07 9:44 ` David Laight
2020-05-07 13:38 ` Mickaël Salaün
2020-05-08 7:15 ` Lev R. Oshvang .
2020-05-08 14:01 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAP22eLEy5nc4u6gPHtY56afrvF9oTNBwRwNAc7Le=Y_8V49nqQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=levonshe@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=christian@python.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=deven.desai@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=ericchiang@google.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=mickael.salaun@ssi.gouv.fr \
--cc=mjg59@google.com \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=philippe.trebuchet@ssi.gouv.fr \
--cc=scottsh@microsoft.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=steve.dower@python.org \
--cc=thibaut.sautereau@ssi.gouv.fr \
--cc=vincent.strubel@ssi.gouv.fr \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).