On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 2:46 AM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 2:46 PM Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > Thanks for the review.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 8:19 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 06:26:43PM +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> > > > As part of moving the thermal bindings to YAML, split it up into 3
> > > > bindings: thermal sensors, cooling devices and thermal zones.
> > > >
> > > > The thermal-zone binding is a software abstraction to capture the
> > > > properties of each zone - how often they should be checked, the
> > > > temperature thresholds (trips) at which mitigation actions need to be
> > > > taken and the level of mitigation needed at those thresholds.
>

[...]

>
> > > > +            /* ... */
> > > > +
> > > > +            gpu-thermal-top {
> > >
> > > This one is not going to match (which should cause an error).
> >
> > Good catch. Unfortunately, this isn't getting caught. Nor is the
> > 12-char limitation before -thermal in the thermal zone name. I can't
> > figure out why.
>
> That's because this schema has to be included by another schema which
> matches on a parent node containing 'thermal-zones'. If
> 'thermal-zones' can be at the root node, then you should rework this
> such that you have $nodename: {const: thermal-zones} as a top-level
> property.

I've done all the change requested in the review(see attached patch),
including moving to

properties:
   $nodename:
       const: thermal-zones

but that generates a bunch of errors similar to:

/home/amit/work/builds/build-aarch64/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/zte.example.dt.yaml:
/: $nodename:0: 'thermal-zones' was expected
/home/amit/work/builds/build-aarch64/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.example.dt.yaml:
/: $nodename:0: 'thermal-zones' was expected
/home/amit/work/builds/build-aarch64/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.example.dt.yaml:
/: $nodename:0: 'thermal-zones' was expected
/home/amit/work/builds/build-aarch64/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sprd/sprd.example.dt.yaml:
/: $nodename:0: 'thermal-zones' was expected
/home/amit/work/builds/build-aarch64/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/calxeda.example.dt.yaml:
/: $nodename:0: 'thermal-zones' was expected
/home/amit/work/builds/build-aarch64/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/ti,davinci.example.dt.yaml:
/: $nodename:0: 'thermal-zones' was expected
/home/amit/work/builds/build-aarch64/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/spear.example.dt.yaml:
/: $nodename:0: 'thermal-zones' was expected
/home/amit/work/builds/build-aarch64/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/nspire.example.dt.yaml:
/: $nodename:0: 'thermal-zones' was expected

It seems like dtc is expecting every node to have a thermal-zones node?

Looking at other root nodes such as cpus.yaml, the main difference I
noticed was the absence of the "select: true" property. However, if I
remove that, we go back to the schema not being applied.

You mentioned that the thermal-zones schema needs to included by
another schema. What did you mean by that?

Regards,
Amit