From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758219AbaGWPf1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jul 2014 11:35:27 -0400 Received: from mail-vc0-f176.google.com ([209.85.220.176]:63511 "EHLO mail-vc0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757765AbaGWPfW (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jul 2014 11:35:22 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140723103707.64071c00@gandalf.local.home> References: <1406004789-9918-1-git-send-email-xerofoify@gmail.com> <874my98p6u.fsf@nemi.mork.no> <20140722193350.GA486@home.goodmis.org> <20140723103707.64071c00@gandalf.local.home> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 11:35:21 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] edac: Remove fixmes in e7xxx_edac.c From: Nick Krause To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Levente Kurusa , Tony Luck , =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?= , Doug Thompson , Borislav Petkov , "m.chehab@samsung.com" , Linux Edac Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 16:56:06 -0400 > Nick Krause wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: >> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 02:25:24PM -0400, Nick Krause wrote: >> >> >> >> I understand what your saying and I should have searched for Page shift. >> >> In addition I am already got commits in the kernel for fix mes so I feel >> >> that your comment on fix mes is incorrect. >> > >> > After seeing your other solutions to "fix mes" around the kernel, I now have to >> > investigate the patches that were accepted, and see if they did not cause >> > any new bugs. If any of them do, I will ask to have all your patches reverted. >> > >> > You are not helping. You are actually doing quite the opposite. Who do you work >> > for? Microsoft or Apple? >> > >> > -- Steve >> > >> >> I don't work for any companies. And here is one of them that has been accepted. >> I am removing two fix mes in this file as after dicussing then it seems >> there is no reason to check against Null for usb_device as it can never >> be NULL and this is check is therefore not needed. > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k&m=140612440420712&w=2 > > And your patches seem to be getting reverted. Wow, I think you broke a > new record in having the percentage of patches added to the kernel and > then reverted. Even before they made it to mainline. > > You may be the only developer that has all their commits reverted > before they ever make it into the mainline tree! > > Congratulations! I think it is wise now for all maintainers to add your > email to their /dev/null folder. It will help them from wasting any > more of their precious time on you. > > -- Steve Steve, I have make a few mistakes. That doesn't give you the right to put me under a waste of time yet. Nick