Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 4

From: Nick Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
To: Sachin Kamat <spk.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 4
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 01:42:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPDOMViziMQ3YEsXEtwS=x0B4C=eukDy16wNW9RCWP5rGYkQow@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDOMVj2whs6K1H_bMivAu4d587BK6b6rbj5nufsAE8i7cLtVA@mail.gmail.com>

Both tests for powerpc I can't test as I don't known where the configs
for all yes and random are for powerpc.
Cheers Nick

On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Nick Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here are my test logs for arm. Most of the failures from these builds
> not having default configures or  make one by one errors. Below are
> my typed results. In the next message I will be sending logs for powerpc.
> Results
> iop13xx_defconfig - Successes in my tests
> mackerel_defconfig - Fails in my tests
> nuc910_defconfig - Fails in my tests
> nuc950_defconfig -Fails in my tests
> nuc960_defconfig - Fails in my tests
> s5p64x0_defconfig - Fails in my tests
> s5p64x0_defconfig - Fails in my tests
> arm-randconfig -Fails in my tests
> Cheers Nick
>
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Nick Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sorry my mistake some of this are wrong I will resend.
>> Cheers Nick
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Nick Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Here are my test logs for arm. Most of the failures from these builds
>>> not having default configures or  make one by one errors. Below are
>>> my typed results.
>>> Results
>>> iop13xx_defconfig - Successes in my tests
>>> mackerel_defconfig - Fails in my tests
>>> nuc910_defconfig - Fails in my tests
>>> nuc950_defconfig -Fails in my tests
>>> nuc960_defconfig - Fails in my tests
>>> s5p64x0_defconfig - Fails in my tests
>>> s5p64x0_defconfig - Fails in my tests
>>> arm-randconfig -Fails in my tests
>>> BF561-ACVILON_defconfig -Fails in my tests
>>> BlackStamp_defconfig - Fails in my tests
>>> TCM-BF518_defconfig - Fails in my tests
>>>
>>> Cheers Nick
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Nick Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hey guys ,
>>>> I checking Sachin Karmat's tests and fixing compile issues with
>>>> patches if need be. In my next email I am going to give a up to date
>>>> log of still failing builds for arm.
>>>> Cheers Nick
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Sachin Kamat <spk.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 6:18 AM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 01:10:58AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Sachin,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 14:12:11 +0530 Sachin Kamat <spk.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Was bisecting a kernel crash on Arndale octa board (Exynos5420). It
>>>>>>> > points to a merge
>>>>>>> > commit:
>>>>>>> > 40556a4c485d12d324f1ea196cc30f590e564237 is the first bad commit
>>>>>>> > ("Merge remote-tracking branch 'nfsd/nfsd-next'").
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > How do I proceed with this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I guess we get the owner of the tree (possibly) in question involved
>>>>>>> (cc'd).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looking at the total diffstat for that branch, it's almost all contained
>>>>>> in fs/nfsd with a little in include/linux/sunrpc/ and net/sunrpc.  So
>>>>>> it's extremely unlikely that it would be causing a problem unless you're
>>>>>> actually testing nfsd.
>>>>>
>>>>> I found it surprising too as I do not use nfsd. I will try out the things
>>>>> suggested by Stephen and update.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Sachin.
>>>>> --
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/