From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752982AbaFMKjw (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2014 06:39:52 -0400 Received: from mail-qc0-f180.google.com ([209.85.216.180]:56826 "EHLO mail-qc0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752197AbaFMKjv (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2014 06:39:51 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1402598935-3701-1-git-send-email-markus.mayer@linaro.org> References: <1402598935-3701-1-git-send-email-markus.mayer@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 12:39:50 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] mmc: sdhci: Use mmc core regulator infrastucture From: Ulf Hansson To: Markus Mayer Cc: Chris Ball , Tim Kryger , Mike Looijmans , Andrew Bresticker , Linux MMC List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12 June 2014 20:48, Markus Mayer wrote: > This series switches the common SDHCI code over to use mmc_host's > regulator pointers rather than keeping its own set. > > In addition, we can now re-use the newly introduced local "mmc" pointer > in several other function calls in lieu of using host->mmc. > > The first patch in the series has been posted before > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/24/947). The two follow-on patches have > not. Patches 2 & 3 could be squashed together if the maintainers were > so inclined. Yes, please squash them. Otherwise this looks great! Kind regards Uffe