linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/13] mmc: sunxi: Always set signal delay to 0 for A64
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 09:16:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFoatUWz0AwY6e73OCguDx70B1B5OAoPUYX-JDPsru+aZw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67fd7dad745b49bb8edb7391655eaddf6f35160e.1484585798.git-series.maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>

On 16 January 2017 at 17:56, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Experience have shown that the using the  autocalibration could severely
> degrade the performances of the MMC bus.
>
> Allwinner is using in its BSP a delay set to 0 for all the modes but HS400.
> Remove the calibration code for now, and add comments to document our
> findings.

So doesn't this break some platforms using HS400? Or are you saying
those are already broken?

Kind regards
Uffe

>
> Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c | 50 ++++++++++++-------------------------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> index 019f95e8e7c5..b9c8a62bc212 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> @@ -683,41 +683,19 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host, u32 oclk_en)
>
>  static int sunxi_mmc_calibrate(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host, int reg_off)
>  {
> -       u32 reg = readl(host->reg_base + reg_off);
> -       u32 delay;
> -       unsigned long timeout;
> -
>         if (!host->cfg->can_calibrate)
>                 return 0;
>
> -       reg &= ~(SDXC_CAL_DL_MASK << SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_SHIFT);
> -       reg &= ~SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_EN;
> -
> -       writel(reg | SDXC_CAL_START, host->reg_base + reg_off);
> -
> -       dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "calibration started\n");
> -
> -       timeout = jiffies + HZ * SDXC_CAL_TIMEOUT;
> -
> -       while (!((reg = readl(host->reg_base + reg_off)) & SDXC_CAL_DONE)) {
> -               if (time_before(jiffies, timeout))
> -                       cpu_relax();
> -               else {
> -                       reg &= ~SDXC_CAL_START;
> -                       writel(reg, host->reg_base + reg_off);
> -
> -                       return -ETIMEDOUT;
> -               }
> -       }
> -
> -       delay = (reg >> SDXC_CAL_DL_SHIFT) & SDXC_CAL_DL_MASK;
> -
> -       reg &= ~SDXC_CAL_START;
> -       reg |= (delay << SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_SHIFT) | SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_EN;
> -
> -       writel(reg, host->reg_base + reg_off);
> -
> -       dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "calibration ended, reg is 0x%x\n", reg);
> +       /*
> +        * FIXME:
> +        * This is not clear how the calibration is supposed to work
> +        * yet. The best rate have been obtained by simply setting the
> +        * delay to 0, as Allwinner does in its BSP.
> +        *
> +        * The only mode that doesn't have such a delay is HS400, that
> +        * is in itself a TODO.
> +        */
> +       writel(SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_EN, host->reg_base + reg_off);
>
>         return 0;
>  }
> @@ -809,7 +787,13 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_clk_set_rate(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host,
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;
>
> -       /* TODO: enable calibrate on sdc2 SDXC_REG_DS_DL_REG of A64 */
> +       /*
> +        * FIXME:
> +        *
> +        * In HS400 we'll also need to calibrate the data strobe
> +        * signal. This should only happen on the MMC2 controller (at
> +        * least on the A64).
> +        */
>
>         return sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff(host, 1);
>  }
> --
> git-series 0.8.11

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-24  8:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-16 16:56 [PATCH v3 0/13] arm64: allwinner: a64: Enable MMC support Maxime Ripard
2017-01-16 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/13] mmc: sunxi: Fix clock frequency change sequence Maxime Ripard
2017-01-24  8:12   ` Ulf Hansson
2017-01-25  8:26     ` Maxime Ripard
2017-01-16 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/13] mmc: sunxi: Gate the clock when rate is 0 Maxime Ripard
2017-01-24  8:14   ` Ulf Hansson
2017-01-16 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 3/13] mmc: sunxi: Always set signal delay to 0 for A64 Maxime Ripard
2017-01-24  8:16   ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
2017-01-24  9:15     ` Andre Przywara
2017-01-25  9:10     ` Maxime Ripard
2017-01-16 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 4/13] mmc: sunxi: Enable the new timings for the A64 MMC controllers Maxime Ripard
2017-01-16 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 5/13] mmc: sunxi: Mask DATA0 when updating the clock Maxime Ripard
2017-01-24  8:18   ` Ulf Hansson
2017-01-25  9:16     ` Maxime Ripard
2017-01-16 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 6/13] mmc: sunxi: Add EMMC (MMC2) controller compatible Maxime Ripard
2017-01-16 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 7/13] mmc: sunxi: Add more debug messages Maxime Ripard
2017-01-24  8:22   ` Ulf Hansson
2017-01-25  9:16     ` Maxime Ripard
2017-01-16 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 8/13] arm64: allwinner: a64: Add MMC nodes Maxime Ripard
2017-01-16 19:16   ` Corentin Labbe
2017-01-25  9:17     ` Maxime Ripard
2017-01-16 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 9/13] arm64: allwinner: a64: Add MMC pinctrl nodes Maxime Ripard
2017-01-16 16:57 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] arm64: allwinner: a64: Increase the MMC max frequency Maxime Ripard
2017-01-16 16:57 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] arm64: allwinner: pine64: add MMC support Maxime Ripard
2017-01-16 16:57 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] arm64: allwinner: a64: add UART1 pin nodes Maxime Ripard
2017-01-16 16:57 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] arm64: allwinner: add BananaPi-M64 support Maxime Ripard
2017-01-23 10:58 ` [PATCH v3 0/13] arm64: allwinner: a64: Enable MMC support Maxime Ripard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPDyKFoatUWz0AwY6e73OCguDx70B1B5OAoPUYX-JDPsru+aZw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).