linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Chris Ball <chris@printf.net>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mmc: mmci: move block size validation under relevant code
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 13:55:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFok=r__hx1RaXFgttCQkeocSADY59nSPTZ6DUXQdddBRg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1408446866-1649-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>

On 19 August 2014 13:14, Srinivas Kandagatla
<srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> wrote:
> This code moves a BUG_ON condition to relevant if block, this check is
> not necessary for IPs which can set any arbitrary block size in a given
> range.
> This patch is necessary for SDIO which sets block sizes that are exactly
> not power of 2.
>
> Original issue detected while testing WLAN ath6kl on Qualcomm APQ8064 SOC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c | 11 ++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
> index 3089fba..1c99195 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
> @@ -800,15 +800,16 @@ static void mmci_start_data(struct mmci_host *host, struct mmc_data *data)
>         writel(timeout, base + MMCIDATATIMER);
>         writel(host->size, base + MMCIDATALENGTH);
>
> -       blksz_bits = ffs(data->blksz) - 1;
> -       BUG_ON(1 << blksz_bits != data->blksz);

I don't like this BUG_ON at all, I would prefer if we remove it. The
original patch "mmc: mmci: Support any block sizes for ux500v2", did
so as well.

Now, if we still think removing it is fragile, let additional tests in
mmci_validate_data() and return and error code from there.

Kind regards
Uffe

>
> -       if (variant->blksz_datactrl16)
> +       if (variant->blksz_datactrl16) {
>                 datactrl = MCI_DPSM_ENABLE | (data->blksz << 16);
> -       else if (variant->blksz_datactrl4)
> +       } else if (variant->blksz_datactrl4) {
>                 datactrl = MCI_DPSM_ENABLE | (data->blksz << 4);
> -       else
> +       } else {
> +               blksz_bits = ffs(data->blksz) - 1;
> +               BUG_ON(1 << blksz_bits != data->blksz);
>                 datactrl = MCI_DPSM_ENABLE | blksz_bits << 4;
> +       }
>
>         if (data->flags & MMC_DATA_READ)
>                 datactrl |= MCI_DPSM_DIRECTION;
> --
> 1.9.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-19 11:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-12 12:02 [PATCH RFC 0/5] mmc: mmci: sdio related fixes Srinivas Kandagatla
2014-08-12 12:03 ` [PATCH RFC 1/5] mmc: mmci: Enable SDIO support for Qualcomm variant data Srinivas Kandagatla
2014-08-12 12:03 ` [PATCH RFC 2/5] mmc: mmci: move block size validation under relevant code Srinivas Kandagatla
2014-08-12 12:04 ` [PATCH RFC 3/5] mmc: mmci: relax blksz check for SDIO Srinivas Kandagatla
2014-08-12 14:12   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-08-13  5:14     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2014-08-13  8:54       ` Linus Walleij
2014-08-12 12:05 ` [PATCH RFC 4/5] mmc: mmci: Add sdio enable mask in variant data Srinivas Kandagatla
2014-08-13  8:55   ` Linus Walleij
2014-08-12 12:05 ` [PATCH RFC 5/5] mmc: mmci: move ST specific sdio setup under a condition Srinivas Kandagatla
2014-08-13  8:58   ` Linus Walleij
2014-08-13  9:45     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2014-08-19 11:13 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] mmc: mmci: sdio related fixes Srinivas Kandagatla
2014-08-19 11:14   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mmc: mmci: Support any block sizes for ux500v2 and qcom variant Srinivas Kandagatla
2014-08-19 12:37     ` Ulf Hansson
2014-08-19 11:14   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mmc: mmci: move block size validation under relevant code Srinivas Kandagatla
2014-08-19 11:55     ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
2014-08-19 12:08       ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2014-08-19 11:15   ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mmc: mmci: Add sdio enable mask in variant data Srinivas Kandagatla
2014-08-19 11:15   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mmc: mmci: rename sdio flag in vendor data to st_sdio Srinivas Kandagatla
2014-08-22  4:53   ` [PATCH v3 0/3] mmc: mmci: sdio related fixes Srinivas Kandagatla
2014-08-22  4:54     ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mmc: mmci: Support any block sizes for ux500v2 and qcom variant Srinivas Kandagatla
2014-09-10  7:58       ` Ulf Hansson
2014-09-10  9:07         ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2014-09-10 10:51           ` Ulf Hansson
2015-07-09 21:40       ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-03-05 22:25       ` Linus Walleij
2019-03-06 17:03         ` Bjorn Andersson
2014-08-22  4:54     ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mmc: mmci: Add sdio enable mask in variant data Srinivas Kandagatla
2014-09-10  7:47       ` Ulf Hansson
2014-08-22  4:55     ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mmc: mmci: rename sdio flag in vendor data to st_sdio Srinivas Kandagatla
2014-09-10  7:48       ` Ulf Hansson
2014-09-09  8:34     ` [PATCH] mmc: mmci_qcom_dml: fix is never less than zero warning Srinivas Kandagatla
2014-09-09 11:53       ` Ulf Hansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPDyKFok=r__hx1RaXFgttCQkeocSADY59nSPTZ6DUXQdddBRg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=chris@printf.net \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).