From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751256AbdE3J0k (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 May 2017 05:26:40 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-f181.google.com ([209.85.216.181]:36086 "EHLO mail-qt0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750951AbdE3J0i (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 May 2017 05:26:38 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170530071609.p4wrpqywrfllgy4z@dell> References: <20170528093051.11816-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20170528093051.11816-5-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20170530071609.p4wrpqywrfllgy4z@dell> From: Ulf Hansson Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 11:26:37 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] mmc: use proper name for the R-Car SoC To: Lee Jones Cc: Wolfram Sang , Linux-Renesas , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 30 May 2017 at 09:16, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 29 May 2017, Ulf Hansson wrote: > >> On 28 May 2017 at 11:30, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> > It is 'R-Car', not 'RCar'. No code or binding changes, only descriptive text. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang >> >> Thanks, applied for next! >> >> For mfd, Lee, please tell if you have any issues me picking this via >> my mmc tree. > > I don't, but it is normal procedure to wait for an Ack from all > Maintainers involved before applying. ;) Yeah! However this was that trivial so I went ahead. :-) Kind regards Uffe