From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> To: Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Sandeep Tripathy <milun.tripathy@gmail.com>, Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>, Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@wdc.com>, Liush <liush@allwinnertech.com>, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>, DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 5/8] cpuidle: Factor-out power domain related code from PSCI domain driver Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 20:01:16 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAPDyKFpxx-jBbL4o_iJCcivFL2ei5a7PcWVfUaBmLu-q89Mkjg@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210517130823.796963-6-anup.patel@wdc.com> On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 15:10, Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com> wrote: > > The generic power domain related code in PSCI domain driver is largely > independent of PSCI and can be shared with RISC-V SBI domain driver > hence we factor-out this code into dt_idle_genpd.c and dt_idle_genpd.h. > > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com> This is clearly a big step in the right direction. Just a couple minor things, see more below. Note that, I have a couple of patches in the pipe for the cpuidle-psci-domain driver (not ready to be posted). I need a couple of more days to confirm this restructuring still makes sense beyond these potential new changes. I will let you know as soon as I can with the outcome. [...] > diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/dt_idle_genpd.c b/drivers/cpuidle/dt_idle_genpd.c I think it would be a good idea to add a new section for this to the MAINTAINERS file. Perhaps a "DT IDLE DOMAIN" section? Or perhaps you have another idea? In any case, I am happy to continue with maintenance of this code, even in the new restructured form. > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..5a901773db60 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/dt_idle_genpd.c > @@ -0,0 +1,182 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > +/* > + * PM domains for CPUs via genpd. > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2019 Linaro Ltd. > + * Author: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> > + * > + * Copyright (c) 2021 Western Digital Corporation or its affiliates. > + */ > + > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "dt-idle-genpd: " fmt > + > +#include <linux/cpu.h> > +#include <linux/device.h> > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > +#include <linux/pm_domain.h> > +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > +#include <linux/slab.h> > +#include <linux/string.h> > + > +#include "dt_idle_genpd.h" > + > +static int dt_pd_parse_state_nodes( > + int (*parse_state)(struct device_node *, u32 *), > + struct genpd_power_state *states, int state_count) > +{ > + int i, ret; > + u32 state, *state_buf; > + > + for (i = 0; i < state_count; i++) { > + ret = parse_state(to_of_node(states[i].fwnode), &state); > + if (ret) > + goto free_state; > + > + state_buf = kmalloc(sizeof(u32), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!state_buf) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + goto free_state; > + } > + *state_buf = state; > + states[i].data = state_buf; > + } > + > + return 0; > + > +free_state: > + i--; > + for (; i >= 0; i--) > + kfree(states[i].data); > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int dt_pd_parse_states(struct device_node *np, > + int (*parse_state)(struct device_node *, u32 *), > + struct genpd_power_state **states, > + int *state_count) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + /* Parse the domain idle states. */ > + ret = of_genpd_parse_idle_states(np, states, state_count); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + /* Fill out the dt specifics for each found state. */ > + ret = dt_pd_parse_state_nodes(parse_state, *states, *state_count); > + if (ret) > + kfree(*states); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static void dt_pd_free_states(struct genpd_power_state *states, > + unsigned int state_count) > +{ > + int i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < state_count; i++) > + kfree(states[i].data); > + kfree(states); > +} > + > +void dt_pd_free(struct generic_pm_domain *pd) > +{ > + dt_pd_free_states(pd->states, pd->state_count); > + kfree(pd->name); > + kfree(pd); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dt_pd_free); > + > +struct generic_pm_domain *dt_pd_alloc(struct device_node *np, > + int (*parse_state)(struct device_node *, u32 *)) > +{ > + struct generic_pm_domain *pd; > + struct genpd_power_state *states = NULL; > + int ret, state_count = 0; > + > + pd = kzalloc(sizeof(*pd), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!pd) > + goto out; > + > + pd->name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np); > + if (!pd->name) > + goto free_pd; > + > + /* > + * Parse the domain idle states and let genpd manage the state selection > + * for those being compatible with "domain-idle-state". > + */ > + ret = dt_pd_parse_states(np, parse_state, &states, &state_count); > + if (ret) > + goto free_name; > + > + pd->free_states = dt_pd_free_states; > + pd->name = kbasename(pd->name); > + pd->states = states; > + pd->state_count = state_count; > + > + pr_debug("alloc PM domain %s\n", pd->name); > + return pd; > + > +free_name: > + kfree(pd->name); > +free_pd: > + kfree(pd); > +out: > + pr_err("failed to alloc PM domain %pOF\n", np); > + return NULL; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dt_pd_alloc); > + > +int dt_pd_init_topology(struct device_node *np) > +{ > + struct device_node *node; > + struct of_phandle_args child, parent; > + int ret; > + > + for_each_child_of_node(np, node) { > + if (of_parse_phandle_with_args(node, "power-domains", > + "#power-domain-cells", 0, &parent)) > + continue; > + > + child.np = node; > + child.args_count = 0; > + ret = of_genpd_add_subdomain(&parent, &child); > + of_node_put(parent.np); > + if (ret) { > + of_node_put(node); > + return ret; > + } > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dt_pd_init_topology); May I suggest that we stick to dt_idle_* as the prefix for all of the exported functions in this file. Static functions can just skip the prefix altogether. > + > +struct device *dt_idle_genpd_attach_cpu(int cpu, const char *name) > +{ > + struct device *dev; > + > + dev = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(get_cpu_device(cpu), name); > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev)) > + return dev; > + > + pm_runtime_irq_safe(dev); > + if (cpu_online(cpu)) > + pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); > + > + dev_pm_syscore_device(dev, true); > + > + return dev; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dt_idle_genpd_attach_cpu); > + > +void dt_idle_genpd_detach_cpu(struct device *dev) > +{ > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev)) > + return; > + > + dev_pm_domain_detach(dev, false); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dt_idle_genpd_detach_cpu); Again, a minor comment on the naming of the functions. How about skipping "genpd" in the prefix, thus just dt_idle_attach|detach_cpu()? [...] Kind regards Uffe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-24 18:01 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-05-17 13:08 [RFC PATCH v4 0/8] RISC-V CPU Idle Support Anup Patel 2021-05-17 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/8] RISC-V: Enable CPU_IDLE drivers Anup Patel 2021-05-17 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/8] RISC-V: Rename relocate() and make it global Anup Patel 2021-05-17 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/8] RISC-V: Add arch functions for non-retentive suspend entry/exit Anup Patel 2021-05-17 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/8] RISC-V: Add SBI HSM suspend related defines Anup Patel 2021-05-17 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v4 5/8] cpuidle: Factor-out power domain related code from PSCI domain driver Anup Patel 2021-05-24 18:01 ` Ulf Hansson [this message] 2021-05-25 5:39 ` Anup Patel 2021-05-25 9:05 ` Ulf Hansson 2021-05-28 9:26 ` Ulf Hansson 2021-05-17 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v4 6/8] cpuidle: Add RISC-V SBI CPU idle driver Anup Patel 2021-05-17 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v4 7/8] dt-bindings: Add common bindings for ARM and RISC-V idle states Anup Patel 2021-05-17 13:08 ` [RFC PATCH v4 8/8] RISC-V: Enable RISC-V SBI CPU Idle driver for QEMU virt machine Anup Patel
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=CAPDyKFpxx-jBbL4o_iJCcivFL2ei5a7PcWVfUaBmLu-q89Mkjg@mail.gmail.com \ --to=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \ --cc=Alistair.Francis@wdc.com \ --cc=anup.patel@wdc.com \ --cc=anup@brainfault.org \ --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \ --cc=atish.patra@wdc.com \ --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=liush@allwinnertech.com \ --cc=milun.tripathy@gmail.com \ --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \ --cc=palmerdabbelt@google.com \ --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \ --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \ --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \ --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \ --subject='Re: [RFC PATCH v4 5/8] cpuidle: Factor-out power domain related code from PSCI domain driver' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).