From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87B8C64EBC for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 10:11:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B172082A for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 10:11:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="hxiZg5BJ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 77B172082A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727648AbeJDRDz (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2018 13:03:55 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f68.google.com ([209.85.166.68]:43252 "EHLO mail-io1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727432AbeJDRDz (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2018 13:03:55 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f68.google.com with SMTP id y10-v6so7411623ioa.10 for ; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 03:11:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=r9U8GJ7bA7IWXUwn75k/SS4CGv0zhs8KIl4o221x0VE=; b=hxiZg5BJBQ/WKCb3p6SW7PxJyMUkExHmIS8632CuwhFl1wZUoW9eqkZi0wURjzYznD 5Cq2BX8acGeVIeCIZ7pPI0X2fKmFML8SH4BDlZVcCtC2qZ4soI9mi2flYejNdGIMChA2 YAoPupxMlbNGa/YTzXv54W3KTognAfWOgN1RE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=r9U8GJ7bA7IWXUwn75k/SS4CGv0zhs8KIl4o221x0VE=; b=IA1w584NVTH9uH6cDPGI5/0PFPFfxA1534oWs9I0gTR6GTMNgv7O+1cU3LWiC+wiML 9F+QQRAqREIqD+BjJLZssZRqMo/oNLbWxnrU2wa6GC6syvIIeeqtBxGB+y7KYM/SuB0m HLVvQf6vBDX32+lEfnhaapv5VgMJx8e6DN8rRXzcc1cXLkggyv34qFKJ0tLgwVG/j5PU BOPwR187HZZYuFtkibbbiuDHCl2h5/o922jwqqfBcS2i2gIqWOH25nkuCmkNnaFSi5C8 Fgo7E0hnzg3PKxM+Eb49asb1+8Vaqv3QGXUWBTr3E8OKGDVMZhpDGjTZnlGaaTweebBa 4F1w== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoiM/MXoJUrLF50tq29T2WMapDf49aq4QeyBRIBHYjwYZvyk+aAZ H3wLFLWP1IjlmTP3OXE8brNkVAyKpvDAWsp3999kJg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV628cOhvEh+S2U9KBeD6/H5L8UM/V0Vh6FpK2s/xb4BYgrTFjHrTcV+QRv1o7hL107ZVhl3vq37FvpXxtMqeit4= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:203:: with SMTP id 3-v6mr3787776ioc.131.1538647881014; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 03:11:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a02:3941:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 03:10:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20181003143824.13059-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <10136406.EY9A7BdqYq@aspire.rjw.lan> From: Ulf Hansson Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 12:10:40 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/11] PM / Domains: Support hierarchical CPU arrangement (PSCI/ARM) (a subset) To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Sudeep Holla , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Mark Rutland , Daniel Lezcano , Linux PM , Tony Lindgren , Kevin Hilman , Lina Iyer , Rob Herring , Viresh Kumar , Vincent Guittot , Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux ARM , linux-arm-msm , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4 October 2018 at 11:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 11:04 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> On Thursday, October 4, 2018 10:58:53 AM CEST Ulf Hansson wrote: >> > On 4 October 2018 at 10:39, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 4:39 PM Ulf Hansson wrote: >> > >> >> > >> I have digested the review comments so far, including a recent offlist chat >> > >> with with Lorenzo Pieralisi around the debatable PSCI changes. More or less I >> > >> have a plan for how to move forward. >> > >> >> > >> However, to avoid re-posting non-changed patches over and over again, I decided >> > >> to withhold the more debatable part from this v9, hence this is not the complete >> > >> series to make things play. In v9, I have just included the trivial changes, >> > >> which are either already acked/reviewed or hopefully can be rather soon/easily. >> > >> >> > >> My hope is to get this queued for v4.20, to move things forward. I know it's >> > >> late, but there are more or less nothing new here since v8. >> > > >> > > I have no problems with the first three patches in this series, so I >> > > can apply them right away. Do you want me to do that? >> > >> > Yes, please. >> > >> > > >> > > As for the rest, the cpuidle driver patch looks OK to me, but the >> > > PSCI-related ones need ACKs. >> > >> > For some yes, but I think you can go ahead with a few more. >> > >> > Patch 4, 5 is already acked/reviewed. >> > >> > Patch 6 should be fine (if you are okay with it else wait for an ack >> > from Daniel) >> >> OK, thanks. >> >> Do the 4-6 depend on the 1-3? > > I don't see any dependency there, so I'll queue up the 1-3 in > pm-domains and the 4-6 in pm-cpuidle. Great, thanks! Make sure you put the remaining of the PSCI changes on pm-cpuidle (once acked), as there are dependency. Kind regards Uffe