From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753386AbcANMvD (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2016 07:51:03 -0500 Received: from mail-qk0-f170.google.com ([209.85.220.170]:34975 "EHLO mail-qk0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753272AbcANMu7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2016 07:50:59 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1447426572-11756-1-git-send-email-holgerschurig@gmail.com> <87r3ierjae.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:50:58 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] mmc: Field Firmware Update From: Ulf Hansson To: Chris Ball Cc: Holger Schurig , Olof Johansson , Avi Shchislowski , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Alex Lemberg , Baolin Wang , Gwendal Grignou , Grant Grundler , Seshagiri Holi , Jon Hunter Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22 December 2015 at 19:51, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi, > >> Chris has been busy with other stuff the last couple of years, is there a >> lot of mmc-utils code that's out there that hasn't been picked up? I don't really know. Although, I wanted to make sure that the tool still was still being maintained as otherwise people sooner or later will not care to send patches. > > I've been applying mmc-utils patches as I get them -- last push was five > weeks ago. So I don't have a backlog, but if people are sending mmc-utils > patches to lists rather than to me directly, I'm unlikely to see them there. > I haven't bothered much at looking at mmc utils patches, although I have noticed some being posted without any response or being picked up. I browsed the history of these patches and noticed that it's exactly as you say. These haven't been sent directly you or they were sent to an incorrect email address. I apologize if I was giving the wrong impression that you didn't maintain mmc utils very well, you certainly are! Perhaps we should add some information about it in the mmc kernel doc, to make it more visible. Kind regards Uffe