Re: [PATCH 1/8] mmc: sdhci-st: Intial support for ST SDHCI controller

[Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>]

On 4 June 2014 10:48, Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> Thanks for reviewing, see my comments below: -
>
> On Fri, 23 May 2014, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> > +static unsigned int sdhci_st_get_max_clk(struct sdhci_host *host)
>> > +{
>> > +       struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
>> > +
>> > +       return clk_get_rate(pltfm_host->clk);
>> > +}
>>
>> There are sdhci library function for the above:
>> sdhci_pltfm_clk_get_max_clock()
>
> I've fixed in v2 to use the library function
>
>> > +       host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_BUS_WIDTH_TEST
>> > +                       | MMC_CAP_1_8V_DDR;
>>
>> Comment below.
>>
>> > +
>> > +       if (of_property_read_bool(np, "non-removable"))
>> > +               host->mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE;
>>
>> MMC_CAP_1_8V_DDR, MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA, MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE aren’t
>> those board specific capabilities?
>
> Yep
>>
>> Unless there are something that prevents you from using the common mmc
>> DT parser, I would suggest you to use it. mmc_of_parse(). Thus you can
>> provide these capabilities through DT instead.
>
> Thanks for pointing that out, I've switched over to using mmc_of_parse,
> and everything works as expected.
>
> Also as an added bonus this will simplify support for the next SoC which
> needs access to the high speed ddr / sdr bindings which
> mmc_of_parse already supports :-)
>
> In v2 I've also removed the reset controller code from this platform driver
> with the intention of adding it back in, in the generic code. The idea
> would be that an additional 'reset' binding could be provided, which if
> present would be used to deassert the IP reset line of the controller at
> probe / resume, and assert reset at remove / sleep.
>
> Is this something you view as useful, if so I will prepare some RFC patches?

Sounds useful. Please go ahead and send patches! :-)

Kind regards
Uffe