From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751219AbdLDKlO (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 05:41:14 -0500 Received: from mail-it0-f50.google.com ([209.85.214.50]:38564 "EHLO mail-it0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752166AbdLDKlJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 05:41:09 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZICqbibu9JwB9Vk4LmoIfWvwcvodXDduz2eiY3i+OmefBZWRbhgb2WELsVI5or8546WFS5J9qrATyMhp//0cU= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1713438.irjm9MTSvo@aspire.rjw.lan> From: Ulf Hansson Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 11:41:07 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / runtime: Drop children check from __pm_runtime_set_status() To: Yoshihiro Shimoda Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM , LKML , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Alan Stern , USB list , Linux-Renesas , Kishon Vijay Abraham I Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1 December 2017 at 12:03, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > Hi, > >> From: Ulf Hansson, Sent: Friday, December 1, 2017 6:22 PM >> >> + Kishon >> >> On 30 November 2017 at 13:51, Yoshihiro Shimoda >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> >> From: Ulf Hansson, Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 6:59 PM >> >> >> >> On 29 November 2017 at 10:43, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> >> > Hi Ulf, >> > >> >> Okay, so the problem remains no matter which solution for wakeup you >> >> pick in genpd. >> > >> > Yes. Today I could reproduce this issue without usb host driver. >> > - The renesas_usb3 usb peripheral driver has generic phy handling. >> > (The peripheral driver uses different generic phy driver (phy-rcar-gen3-usb3.c) though.) >> > --> If I used the current renesas_usb3 (this means doesn't call phy_power_{on,off}(), >> > the issue didn't happen. >> > --> If I added phy_power_{on,off}() calling, the issue happened. >> > --> So, I'm thinking the APIs are related to the issue. >> >> Yes. >> >> > >> > - The generic phy APIs are in drivers/phy/phy-core.c. >> > --> The phy-rcar-gen3-usb[23] drivers call only pm_runtime_enable() before devm_phy_create(). >> > --> The phy-core will call pm_runtime_{get_sync,put}() in phy_{init,exit,power_{on,off}}. >> > --> So, IIUC, both devices of phy-. and will be handled by runtime PM APIs. >> > --> The runtime PM implementation of phy-core seems good to me. But...? >> >> >> I have digested the information that you and Geert provided, thanks! >> >> So, my conclusions so far is: >> >> The phy core is using runtime PM reference counting at >> phy_power_on|off(). Although it does that on the phy core device, >> which is a child device of the phy provider device. >> >> Because phy_power_off() is called during system suspend from phy >> consumer drivers like usb, the phy core device (child) and the phy >> provider device (parent) will never become runtime suspended (because >> the PM core has invoked pm_runtime_get_no_resume() for all device in >> the device prepare phase). >> >> Then, when genpd calls pm_runtime_force_suspend() at the suspend noirq >> phase for the phy provider device, the call to >> pm_runtime_set_suspended() in there, triggers the earlier error >> message, which is because the child (phy core device) is still runtime >> resumed. > > Thank you very much for the conclusions! > It's helpful to me about runtime PM behavior. > >> >> Then this seems to point to that the driver may be misbehaving in some >> >> way. I can help to check what is going on. >> > >> > I guess so. But, I don't find yet... >> >> I think the below patch will help, although I am not sure if that is >> sufficient as a long term fix. > > Thank you very much for your help! > Also, I'm not sure how to fix for a long term kernels though... > >> Can you please try and see if it solves the problems? > > Sure! I tested your patch, and then the following message disappeared! > > Enabling runtime PM for inactive device (ee080200.usb-phy) with active children Great, that confirms my theory. I will re-work the patch and re-post it to see what people thinks about it. > > However, the following message still exists. > > Enabling runtime PM for inactive device (ee080000.usb) with active children > > So, I guess ohci-platform.c also has similar issue. Yes, very likely! However, I need some more time to look into this to be able to suggest a solution. > > JFYI, the ehci-platform.c doesn't have runtime PM handling. > So, I think that error message doesn't output from ehci devices. Right, thanks! Kind regards Uffe