From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE17FC8300A for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 12:57:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58D52074A for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 12:57:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="g6filvbP" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726826AbgD3M5K (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 08:57:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46286 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726483AbgD3M5K (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 08:57:10 -0400 Received: from mail-vs1-xe44.google.com (mail-vs1-xe44.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e44]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E147C035494 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 05:57:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vs1-xe44.google.com with SMTP id e10so1111038vsp.12 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 05:57:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mU9mh8frCSvzZ2AQ8WhgOwwMg+9Km7u/NzzuYl4YD1I=; b=g6filvbPbyIgdPyFg4f/c2OWURlfXHDUJ90Exzzsi3HA3iNVJe8+600azVV+stqhS8 ctrtGOjUDszhu4EBHa6W4hPtviR5pvOXdG6fx5KAlaKp8x/KnbfKQdLt/KZ21gDtGuPg C6WGTadOS274B0S+4Q7ypNfMTqfYhRvmLFfCiFHQssl4Kf6E5zeNZZMIIo5Vx7Z/cJ09 4kmS3wQVQFfCFsr5vRV2I9/MK8v00Th2fqrSCIy7wFzZ2AEI7487CJ+zjjqkmZbALoz1 RPj2b770WBNVnClgVqoM3Z4RWYB0Mee1f31XTfEIjJyYN3OC6K2nwNS4iPjgWeDGMMAN KSYw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mU9mh8frCSvzZ2AQ8WhgOwwMg+9Km7u/NzzuYl4YD1I=; b=Xe05mGO/1c5ME0n0AWqkweciFiMwbY2deKTClBzrm+qEuZP/brQE5doCojWJ8PvaMW TFKBuLQAMmZT/FY9P/1Khq4zkuUtQNrkMGlAsj7EdpjgOx71l/SYLoks+wHDF3kdKJ+m qsQj9SX4HGlWlxxej6xcfp5+GiZyNLZFek/q6w5DJGAhCw6tpdfpM6//ifUhUM4xdZbl VSR+J/KPdKRsi3rEPutr1ZvPP8XPJXRTb3R0H7GsI9LVnyr0dK8g13yRQnDhma0HRkjd /ZsGM6ibKnoNv8BrbsFKOoNcGJ8bEYYABJQo8qIzXIN0nk6sL+HW1+kSnt8nGVmgDeBY x91A== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubxMGAur5HZUitKMlYQv8earTsOT1ypwP8iTnNqNow4xgy8YELU zjoIvuKuXUXH2+t9BdDskYR9AP0pEcQjqLnLtPCsPw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJHim+kVj/j2pLRzz3bLIrkC1LfqpqgRCUbCCsk1fOEYOYCG0w9XnW4TsZTsjBcaDxO5WOK8OXVKrsFW+MZ47k= X-Received: by 2002:a67:8b46:: with SMTP id n67mr2806854vsd.35.1588251427814; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 05:57:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <429da47b-ad51-30eb-ff36-b05780c941ba@linaro.org> <573b7d9e-fb5d-5c81-a981-6d965db933f3@linaro.org> <20200427221752.GA166576@google.com> <7c508403-3b53-8285-5724-c2bca221b77a@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: From: Ulf Hansson Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 14:56:32 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers/clocksource/timer-of: Remove __init markings To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: Saravana Kannan , Thomas Gleixner , Sandeep Patil , Baolin Wang , Orson Zhai , Chunyan Zhang , LKML , Android Kernel Team Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 20:55, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > On 28/04/2020 20:23, Saravana Kannan wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:02 AM Daniel Lezcano > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hi Saravana, > > > > You were replying to Sandeep :) > > Oh, right :) > > Sorry Sandeep. Thanks for taking the time to elaborate a clear statement > of the GKI. > > [ ... ] > > >> That was my understanding of the GKI, thanks for confirming. > >> > >> Putting apart the non-technical aspect of these changes, the benefit I > >> see is the memory usage optimization regarding the single kernel image. > >> > >> With the ARM64 defconfig, multiple platforms and their corresponding > >> drivers are compiled-in. It results in a big kernel image which fails to > >> load because of overlapping on DT load address (or something else). When > >> that is detected, it is fine to adjust the load addresses, otherwise it > >> is painful to narrow down the root cause. > >> > >> In order to prevent this, we have to customize the defconfig each > >> version release. > > > > Sorry, I'm not sure I understand where you are going with this. Are > > you agreeing to pick up this change? > > Right. I agree with the change but I would like to have Thomas opinion > on this before picking the patch. > > Thomas ? I am not Thomas :-) But just wanted to provide some feedback from my side. In general we are careful when deciding to export symbols. And at least, I think at least we should require one user of it before allowing it to be exported (I assume that is what is happening in patch2/2 - I couldn't find it) Kind regards Uffe