From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04587C2BC61 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 10:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90EE20831 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 10:30:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="YjOhnG5b" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A90EE20831 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727521AbeJ3TXE (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2018 15:23:04 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f66.google.com ([209.85.166.66]:43773 "EHLO mail-io1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726721AbeJ3TXE (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2018 15:23:04 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f66.google.com with SMTP id y10-v6so6880011ioa.10 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 03:30:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6Nj+yWUe+wiS0rgS+is2Mtfyw+0vHdQsT72Jg+h9wCg=; b=YjOhnG5b9z0MMUmEzcNrcMVP7FqukyxMURT/br1pXLi280kwsa+a3wD9zg7g/0bI3u 6t/RspR1ETzfoyevAFW9ErAGNOFVbdPig3eNWWwW5nuqrXOJ94Laq3+erepgULRSVdi4 HnT2sZlv496v/PKY0HPQDP3tGR8iBqUmLPpk4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6Nj+yWUe+wiS0rgS+is2Mtfyw+0vHdQsT72Jg+h9wCg=; b=KY7PNed8SjxCCK8Yk16mU8RLBumXzsxS802flvNPyWZdjTgodMdx2yx4HA6B2V6Qxi B98eIRrqekhnE26IlY1/5L4PYf1VzlcY86iQQWU5EnkSpKoGC6Y6i96jnl8dAW3upVyi dxWwHC5JlxgZfFKRfgF8yK1Jqhwn3Ic26OeQlVCYvhv4pJukbFvND2YWoB8VGkKz3Je+ uQc0fz0nDaw8kmoKFZeoHlZ6KxmIHtOp9zMMgWVPAbostcYWolffHQQ2XMnYL+7URC9W gl8eEdjWG2SW5N5B46OBXdaphIkRGMpS0VOovvR3w5E/QJ4mjuo0Y7TW8rs/rnAxwdaE svKg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gK3PS5qSghitap325NeFG2UOZ+k+x3BJn8flxhwNHwkLUmPREZi EfNzeknqD70xpyBJUndB3JRJe7EvZw8VDOQ3/Xf2+g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5enf8kMFwlVQLkvEbc3jctf5TIPks0yT9TCfh0Ov55jCcswduTSjw7UkKzZ+eC1SHVac3kpZfhGrpfTWRa1NjQ= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:8fca:: with SMTP id r193-v6mr11447222iod.266.1540895410140; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 03:30:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a02:38d:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 03:29:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1539206455-29342-1-git-send-email-rplsssn@codeaurora.org> <1539206455-29342-4-git-send-email-rplsssn@codeaurora.org> From: Ulf Hansson Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 11:29:29 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 3/8] timer: Export next wakeup time of a CPU To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: "Raju P.L.S.S.S.N" , Andy Gross , David Brown , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Kevin Hilman , linux-arm-msm , linux-soc@vger.kernel.org, Rajendra Nayak , Bjorn Andersson , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux PM , DTML , Stephen Boyd , Evan Green , Doug Anderson , Matthias Kaehlcke , Lina Iyer , Lina Iyer , Daniel Lezcano , Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 29 October 2018 at 23:36, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Raju, > > On Thu, 11 Oct 2018, Raju P.L.S.S.S.N wrote: >> >> +/** >> + * tick_nohz_get_next_wakeup - return the next wake up of the CPU > > Lacks documentation of @cpu. Please include kernel docs into your test > builds. Good point! > >> + */ >> +ktime_t tick_nohz_get_next_wakeup(int cpu) >> +{ >> + struct clock_event_device *dev = per_cpu(tick_cpu_device.evtdev, cpu); >> + >> + return dev->next_event; >> +} Thanks for your review! Kind regards Uffe