linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiang Biao <benbjiang@gmail.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jiang Biao <benbjiang@tencent.com>,
	Bin Lai <robinlai@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver/pci: reduce the single block time in pci_read_config
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:54:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPJCdB=HzNJp36tjD0=-R-cs4+8=xhxAfmR-tZ2DkpcyiugH-g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200910012543.GA745909@bjorn-Precision-5520>

Hi,

On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 09:25, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 01:20:25PM +0800, Jiang Biao wrote:
> > From: Jiang Biao <benbjiang@tencent.com>
> >
> > pci_read_config() could block several ms in kernel space, mainly
> > caused by the while loop to call pci_user_read_config_dword().
> > Singel pci_user_read_config_dword() loop could consume 130us+,
> >               |    pci_user_read_config_dword() {
> >               |      _raw_spin_lock_irq() {
> > ! 136.698 us  |        native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath();
> > ! 137.582 us  |      }
> >               |      pci_read() {
> >               |        raw_pci_read() {
> >               |          pci_conf1_read() {
> >   0.230 us    |            _raw_spin_lock_irqsave();
> >   0.035 us    |            _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore();
> >   8.476 us    |          }
> >   8.790 us    |        }
> >   9.091 us    |      }
> > ! 147.263 us  |    }
> > and dozens of the loop could consume ms+.
> >
> > If we execute some lspci commands concurrently, ms+ scheduling
> > latency could be detected.
> >
> > Add scheduling chance in the loop to improve the latency.
>
> Thanks for the patch, this makes a lot of sense.
>
> Shouldn't we do the same in pci_write_config()?
Yes, IMHO, that could be helpful too.
I'll send v2 to include that. :)
Thanks a lot for your comment.

Regards,
Jiang

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-10  2:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-24  5:20 [PATCH] driver/pci: reduce the single block time in pci_read_config Jiang Biao
2020-08-27  9:49 ` Jiang Biao
2020-09-10  1:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-10  1:54   ` Jiang Biao [this message]
2020-09-10  1:59     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-10  2:18       ` Jiang Biao
2020-09-13  4:27       ` Jiang Biao
2020-09-16 16:56         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-09-17  0:22           ` Jiang Biao
2020-09-17 17:32 ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPJCdB=HzNJp36tjD0=-R-cs4+8=xhxAfmR-tZ2DkpcyiugH-g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=benbjiang@gmail.com \
    --cc=benbjiang@tencent.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robinlai@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).