Re: [PATCH] watchdog: s3c2410: Fix getting the optional clock

[Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>]

On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 23:08, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>
> On 12/20/21 7:15 AM, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 at 19:50, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12/12/2021 18:02, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> >>> "watchdog_src" clock is optional and may not be present for some SoCs
> >>> supported by this driver. Nevertheless, in case the clock is provided
> >>> but some error happens during its getting, that error should be handled
> >>> properly. Use devm_clk_get_optional() API for that. Also report possible
> >>> errors using dev_err_probe() to handle properly -EPROBE_DEFER error (if
> >>> clock provider is not ready by the time WDT probe function is executed).
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: a4f3dc8d5fbc ("watchdog: s3c2410: Support separate source clock")
> >>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> >>> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> >>> Suggested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
> >>> ---
> >>>   drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
> >>>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
> >>
> >
> > Hi Guenter,
> >
> > If there are no outstanding concerns, can you please apply this one?
> > Would be nice to see it in v5.17 if that's possible.
> >
>
> I added the patch to my watchdog-next tree, but Wim handles all pull
> requests.
>

Thanks, Guenter! Do I need to take any other actions, or Wim is going
to take patches from your tree? I just checked [1] (master branch),
and I can't see my patches there yet.

[1] git://www.linux-watchdog.org/linux-watchdog-next.git

> Thanks,
> Guenter
>
>