linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Muchun Song <smuchun@gmail.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: fix possible use after free on label
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 22:25:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPSr9jEW_+9BSFRLbqMVO=m4+AMih4cHm_AS241TjfvGcMFKAA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbht0wn=Vy4-M-sgEbsiY-S8u3eP0s_DM+j+6vWvZG5cQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Linus,

Thanks for your review.

Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> 于2018年10月31日周三 下午6:32写道:
>
> Hi Muchun,
>
> thanks for your patch!
>
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 3:41 PM Muchun Song <smuchun@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > gpiod_request_commit() copies the pointer to the label
> > passed as an argument only to be used later. But there's a
> > chance the caller could immediately free the passed string
> > (e.g., local variable). This could trigger a use after free
> > when we use gpio label(e.g., gpiochip_unlock_as_irq(),
> > gpiochip_is_requested()).
> >
> > To be on the safe side: duplicate the string with
> > kstrdup_const() so that if an unaware user passes an address
> > to a stack-allocated buffer, we won't get the arbitrary label.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <smuchun@gmail.com>
>
> I am a bit worried about the memory consumption for this,
> but I guess typically this should not be much.

Yeah, I think so. In most cases, we pass the label, which is
in .rodata section.

>
> I am a little bit lost in const-correctness here, and I do
> understand that the label could point to something allocated on
> the stack, but it seems like an awkward way of shooting
> oneself in the foot really. Allocate something and then
> pass it as a const char *? That is something we could pretty
> much detect with a cocinelle script I think?

Some user may have more than one gpio to request
and may program the following code to request one gpio:

int gpio_request_one(int gpio)
{
        char name[8];

        snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "GPIO_%d", gpio);

        return gpio_request(gpio, name);
}

In this case, it could trigger a use after free when we use gpio label.
But the user may not realize it. With this patch applied, we can get
the right label.

>
> Anyways: if you want to proceed with this approach, also
> make sure to fix gpiod_set_consumer_name() to free previous
> label and make a new strdup when called.
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

Sorry, I forgot to fix gpiod_set_consumer_name().
I will send you a patch of v2 later. Thanks.

Yours,
Muchun Song

      reply	other threads:[~2018-10-31 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-24 13:40 [PATCH] gpiolib: fix possible use after free on label Muchun Song
2018-10-31 10:32 ` Linus Walleij
2018-10-31 14:25   ` Muchun Song [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPSr9jEW_+9BSFRLbqMVO=m4+AMih4cHm_AS241TjfvGcMFKAA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=smuchun@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).