linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jue Wang <juew@google.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"dinghui@sangfor.com.cn" <dinghui@sangfor.com.cn>,
	"huangcun@sangfor.com.cn" <huangcun@sangfor.com.cn>,
	"linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)" <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
	"Oscar Salvador" <osalvador@suse.de>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
	"Song, Youquan" <youquan.song@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/mce: Avoid infinite loop for copy from user recovery
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 08:29:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcxDJ7_QiM1ZLCUHvqRAAtst8qd_yhhps8V4fE+Fq2YTPMVnw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fc4d994b02f643d480647edc4f2a7a29@intel.com>

On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 1:43 PM Luck, Tony <tony.luck@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > After cherry picking patch 1 & 2, I saw the following with 2 UC errors injected
> > into the user space buffer passed into write(2), as expected:
> >
> > [  287.994754] Kernel panic - not syncing: Machine checks to different
> > user pages
>
> Interesting.  What are the offsets of the two injected errors in your test (both
> w.r.t. the start of the buffer, and within a page).
They are just random offsets into the first 2 pages of the buffer (4k aligned),
1 error per page. To be precise: 0x440 and 0x1c0 within each page.

>
> > The kernel tested with has its x86/mce and mm/memory-failure aligned with
> > upstream till around 2020/11.
> >
> > Is there any other patch that I have missed to the write syscall etc?
>
> There is a long series of patches from Al Viro to lib/iov_iter.c that are maybe
> also relevent in making the kernel copy from user stop at the first poison
> address in the buffer.
Thanks for the pointer.

Looks like [1],[2] are not yet merged.

Is lib/iov_iter.c the only place the kernel performs a copy from user
and gets multiple
poisons? I suspect not.

For example, lots of kernel accesses to user space memory are from kernel agents
like khugepaged, NUMA auto balancing etc. These paths are not handled by the fix
to lib/iov_iter.c.

I think the fix might have to be made to #MC handler's behavior wrt
the task work.
Send #MC signals and perform memory-failures actions from a task work is fine
for #MCs originated from user space, but not suitable for kernel
accessing poisoned
memory (user space memory). For the latter #MC handler must handle
#MC recovery in the exception context without resorting to task work;
this may be
OK since the recovery action for the later case is minimal: mark PG_hwpoison and
remove the kernel mapping.

1. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210326000235.370514-2-tony.luck@intel.com/
2. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210326000235.370514-3-tony.luck@intel.com/

>
> -Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-02 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-31  6:30 [PATCH 2/3] x86/mce: Avoid infinite loop for copy from user recovery Jue Wang
2021-07-31 20:43 ` Luck, Tony
2021-08-02 15:29   ` Jue Wang [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-07-22 13:54 Jue Wang
2021-07-22 15:19 ` Luck, Tony
2021-07-22 23:30   ` Jue Wang
2021-07-23  0:14     ` Luck, Tony
2021-07-23  3:47       ` Jue Wang
2021-07-23  4:01         ` Luck, Tony
2021-07-23  4:16           ` Jue Wang
2021-07-23 14:47             ` Luck, Tony
2021-07-06 19:06 [PATCH 0/3] More machine check recovery fixes Tony Luck
2021-07-06 19:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/mce: Avoid infinite loop for copy from user recovery Tony Luck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPcxDJ7_QiM1ZLCUHvqRAAtst8qd_yhhps8V4fE+Fq2YTPMVnw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=juew@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dinghui@sangfor.com.cn \
    --cc=huangcun@sangfor.com.cn \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=youquan.song@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).