From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"mike.travis@hpe.com" <mike.travis@hpe.com>,
Andrew Banman <andrew.banman@hpe.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>,
Arun KS <arunks@codeaurora.org>,
Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] mm/memory_hotplug: Remove memory block devices before arch_remove_memory()
Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 14:27:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4gvuBfA0gJrChaUNR-8swU2Vq-UFJA9yRtsEbf2ajf7+w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190507183804.5512-7-david@redhat.com>
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 11:39 AM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Let's factor out removing of memory block devices, which is only
> necessary for memory added via add_memory() and friends that created
> memory block devices. Remove the devices before calling
> arch_remove_memory().
>
> This finishes factoring out memory block device handling from
> arch_add_memory() and arch_remove_memory().
Also nice! makes it easier in the future for the "device-memory" use
case to not avoid messing up the typical memory hotplug flow.
>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: "mike.travis@hpe.com" <mike.travis@hpe.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Andrew Banman <andrew.banman@hpe.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>
> Cc: Arun KS <arunks@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/memory.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> drivers/base/node.c | 11 ++++++-----
> include/linux/memory.h | 2 +-
> include/linux/node.h | 6 ++----
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 5 +++--
> 5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c
> index 862c202a18ca..47ff49058d1f 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/memory.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/memory.c
> @@ -756,32 +756,31 @@ int hotplug_memory_register(unsigned long start, unsigned long size)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int remove_memory_section(struct mem_section *section)
> +/*
> + * Remove memory block devices for the given memory area. Start and size
> + * have to be aligned to memory block granularity. Memory block devices
> + * have to be offline.
> + */
> +void hotplug_memory_unregister(unsigned long start, unsigned long size)
> {
> + unsigned long block_nr_pages = memory_block_size_bytes() >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + unsigned long start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(start);
> + unsigned long end_pfn = start_pfn + (size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> struct memory_block *mem;
> + unsigned long pfn;
>
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!present_section(section)))
> - return;
> + BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(start, memory_block_size_bytes()));
> + BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(size, memory_block_size_bytes()));
Similar BUG_ON vs comments WARN_ON comments as the previous patch.
>
> mutex_lock(&mem_sysfs_mutex);
> -
> - /*
> - * Some users of the memory hotplug do not want/need memblock to
> - * track all sections. Skip over those.
> - */
> - mem = find_memory_block(section);
> - if (!mem)
> - goto out_unlock;
> -
> - unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(mem, __section_nr(section));
> -
> - mem->section_count--;
> - if (mem->section_count == 0)
> + for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn != end_pfn; pfn += block_nr_pages) {
> + mem = find_memory_block(__pfn_to_section(pfn));
> + if (!mem)
> + continue;
> + mem->section_count = 0;
> + unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(mem);
> unregister_memory(mem);
> - else
> - put_device(&mem->dev);
> -
> -out_unlock:
> + }
> mutex_unlock(&mem_sysfs_mutex);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c
> index 8598fcbd2a17..04fdfa99b8bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/node.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/node.c
> @@ -801,9 +801,10 @@ int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, void *arg)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -/* unregister memory section under all nodes that it spans */
> -int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk,
> - unsigned long phys_index)
> +/*
> + * Unregister memory block device under all nodes that it spans.
> + */
> +int unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk)
> {
> NODEMASK_ALLOC(nodemask_t, unlinked_nodes, GFP_KERNEL);
> unsigned long pfn, sect_start_pfn, sect_end_pfn;
> @@ -816,8 +817,8 @@ int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk,
> return -ENOMEM;
> nodes_clear(*unlinked_nodes);
>
> - sect_start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(phys_index);
> - sect_end_pfn = sect_start_pfn + PAGES_PER_SECTION - 1;
> + sect_start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->start_section_nr);
> + sect_end_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->end_section_nr);
> for (pfn = sect_start_pfn; pfn <= sect_end_pfn; pfn++) {
> int nid;
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memory.h b/include/linux/memory.h
> index 95505fbb5f85..aa236c2a0466 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memory.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memory.h
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ extern void unregister_memory_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
> extern int register_memory_isolate_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
> extern void unregister_memory_isolate_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
> int hotplug_memory_register(unsigned long start, unsigned long size);
> -extern void unregister_memory_section(struct mem_section *);
> +void hotplug_memory_unregister(unsigned long start, unsigned long size);
> extern int memory_dev_init(void);
> extern int memory_notify(unsigned long val, void *v);
> extern int memory_isolate_notify(unsigned long val, void *v);
> diff --git a/include/linux/node.h b/include/linux/node.h
> index 1a557c589ecb..02a29e71b175 100644
> --- a/include/linux/node.h
> +++ b/include/linux/node.h
> @@ -139,8 +139,7 @@ extern int register_cpu_under_node(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int nid);
> extern int unregister_cpu_under_node(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int nid);
> extern int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk,
> void *arg);
> -extern int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk,
> - unsigned long phys_index);
> +extern int unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk);
>
> extern int register_memory_node_under_compute_node(unsigned int mem_nid,
> unsigned int cpu_nid,
> @@ -176,8 +175,7 @@ static inline int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk,
> {
> return 0;
> }
> -static inline int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk,
> - unsigned long phys_index)
> +static inline int unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 107f72952347..527fe4f9c620 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -519,8 +519,6 @@ static void __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section *ms,
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!valid_section(ms)))
> return;
>
> - unregister_memory_section(ms);
> -
> scn_nr = __section_nr(ms);
> start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn((unsigned long)scn_nr);
> __remove_zone(zone, start_pfn);
> @@ -1844,6 +1842,9 @@ void __ref __remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
> memblock_free(start, size);
> memblock_remove(start, size);
>
> + /* remove memory block devices before removing memory */
> + hotplug_memory_unregister(start, size);
> +
> arch_remove_memory(nid, start, size, NULL);
> __release_memory_resource(start, size);
Other than the BUG_ON concern you can add
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-07 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190507183804.5512-1-david@redhat.com>
2019-05-07 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] mm/memory_hotplug: Simplify and fix check_hotplug_memory_range() David Hildenbrand
2019-05-07 20:38 ` Dan Williams
2019-05-09 12:23 ` Wei Yang
2019-05-07 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] s390x/mm: Implement arch_remove_memory() David Hildenbrand
2019-05-07 20:46 ` Dan Williams
2019-05-07 20:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-07 20:57 ` Dan Williams
2019-05-07 21:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-07 18:38 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] mm/memory_hotplug: Create memory block devices after arch_add_memory() David Hildenbrand
2019-05-07 21:17 ` Dan Williams
2019-05-07 21:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-08 8:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-09 12:43 ` Wei Yang
2019-05-09 12:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-09 13:55 ` Wei Yang
2019-05-09 14:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-09 14:31 ` Wei Yang
2019-05-09 14:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-09 21:50 ` Wei Yang
2019-05-09 22:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-07 18:38 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] mm/memory_hotplug: Drop MHP_MEMBLOCK_API David Hildenbrand
2019-05-07 21:19 ` Dan Williams
2019-05-07 21:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-07 21:25 ` Dan Williams
2019-05-08 7:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-08 23:08 ` osalvador
2019-05-09 7:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-07 18:38 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] mm/memory_hotplug: Remove memory block devices before arch_remove_memory() David Hildenbrand
2019-05-07 21:27 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2019-05-07 18:38 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] mm/memory_hotplug: Make unregister_memory_block_under_nodes() never fail David Hildenbrand
2019-05-08 0:15 ` Dan Williams
2019-05-08 7:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-08 13:50 ` Dan Williams
2019-05-07 18:38 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] mm/memory_hotplug: Remove "zone" parameter from sparse_remove_one_section David Hildenbrand
2019-05-08 0:30 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPcyv4gvuBfA0gJrChaUNR-8swU2Vq-UFJA9yRtsEbf2ajf7+w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=andrew.banman@hpe.com \
--cc=arunks@codeaurora.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=malat@debian.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mike.travis@hpe.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).