linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	David Nellans <dnellans@nvidia.com>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm/persistent-memory: match IORES_DESC name and enum memory_type one
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 09:15:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hr+p+Bo8dcPfnW+O2q0KWvoM5z9LPZWhXLFJgE5ySojA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170705142516.GA3305@redhat.com>

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 04:49:18PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> wrote:
>> > Use consistent name between IORES_DESC and enum memory_type, rename
>> > MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC to MEMORY_DEVICE_PERSISTENT. This is to free up
>> > the public name for CDM (cache coherent device memory) for which the
>> > term public is a better match.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
>> > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>> > Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
>> > ---
>> >  include/linux/memremap.h | 4 ++--
>> >  kernel/memremap.c        | 2 +-
>> >  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/include/linux/memremap.h b/include/linux/memremap.h
>> > index 57546a07a558..2299cc2d387d 100644
>> > --- a/include/linux/memremap.h
>> > +++ b/include/linux/memremap.h
>> > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static inline struct vmem_altmap *to_vmem_altmap(unsigned long memmap_start)
>> >   * Specialize ZONE_DEVICE memory into multiple types each having differents
>> >   * usage.
>> >   *
>> > - * MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC:
>> > + * MEMORY_DEVICE_PERSISTENT:
>> >   * Persistent device memory (pmem): struct page might be allocated in different
>> >   * memory and architecture might want to perform special actions. It is similar
>> >   * to regular memory, in that the CPU can access it transparently. However,
>> > @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static inline struct vmem_altmap *to_vmem_altmap(unsigned long memmap_start)
>> >   * include/linux/hmm.h and Documentation/vm/hmm.txt.
>> >   */
>> >  enum memory_type {
>> > -       MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC = 0,
>> > +       MEMORY_DEVICE_PERSISTENT = 0,
>> >         MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE,
>> >  };
>> >
>> > diff --git a/kernel/memremap.c b/kernel/memremap.c
>> > index b9baa6c07918..e82456c39a6a 100644
>> > --- a/kernel/memremap.c
>> > +++ b/kernel/memremap.c
>> > @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ void *devm_memremap_pages(struct device *dev, struct resource *res,
>> >         }
>> >         pgmap->ref = ref;
>> >         pgmap->res = &page_map->res;
>> > -       pgmap->type = MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC;
>> > +       pgmap->type = MEMORY_DEVICE_PERSISTENT;
>> >         pgmap->page_fault = NULL;
>> >         pgmap->page_free = NULL;
>> >         pgmap->data = NULL;
>>
>> I think we need a different name. There's nothing "persistent" about
>> the devm_memremap_pages() path. Why can't they share name, is the only
>> difference coherence? I'm thinking something like:
>>
>> MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE
>> MEMORY_DEVICE_COHERENT /* persistent memory and coherent devices */
>> MEMORY_DEVICE_IO /* "public", but not coherent */
>
> No that would not work. Device public (in the context of this patchset)
> is like device private ie device public page can be anywhere inside a
> process address space either as anonymous memory page or as file back
> page of regular filesystem (ie vma->ops is not pointing to anything
> specific to the device memory).
>
> As such device public is different from how persistent memory is use
> and those the cache coherency being the same between the two kind of
> memory is not a discerning factor. So i need to distinguish between
> persistent memory and device public memory.
>
> I believe keeping enum memory_type close to IORES_DESC naming is the
> cleanest way to do that but i am open to other name suggestion.
>

The IORES_DESC has nothing to do with how the memory range is handled
by the core mm. It sounds like the distinction this is trying to make
is between MEMORY_DEVICE_{PUBLIC,PRIVATE} and MEMORY_DEVICE_HOST.
Where a "host" memory range is one that does not need coordination
with a specific device.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-05 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-03 21:14 [PATCH 0/5] Cache coherent device memory (CDM) with HMM v3 Jérôme Glisse
2017-07-03 21:14 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm/persistent-memory: match IORES_DESC name and enum memory_type one Jérôme Glisse
2017-07-03 23:49   ` Dan Williams
2017-07-05 14:25     ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-05 16:15       ` Dan Williams [this message]
2017-07-05 18:49         ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-11  3:48           ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-11  7:31           ` Dan Williams
2017-07-11 15:05             ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-11 16:49               ` Dan Williams
2017-07-03 21:14 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm/device-public-memory: device memory cache coherent with CPU v2 Jérôme Glisse
2017-07-11  4:12   ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-11 14:57     ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-12  5:50       ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-03 21:14 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm/hmm: add new helper to hotplug CDM memory region Jérôme Glisse
2017-07-03 21:14 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm/memcontrol: allow to uncharge page without using page->lru field Jérôme Glisse
2017-07-04 12:51   ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-05  3:18     ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-05  6:38       ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-05 10:22         ` Balbir Singh
2017-07-05 14:35     ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-10  8:28       ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-10 15:32         ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-10 16:04           ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-10 16:25             ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-10 16:36               ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-10 16:54                 ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-10 17:48                   ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-10 18:10                     ` Jerome Glisse
2017-07-03 21:14 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm/memcontrol: support MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE and MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC Jérôme Glisse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPcyv4hr+p+Bo8dcPfnW+O2q0KWvoM5z9LPZWhXLFJgE5ySojA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=dnellans@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).