From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751413AbdLAQ34 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2017 11:29:56 -0500 Received: from mail-oi0-f52.google.com ([209.85.218.52]:33010 "EHLO mail-oi0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751183AbdLAQ3y (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2017 11:29:54 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYH6gGLUbqEWgN8Dvi9QsAn/YbdmV+xt3uAAXKox3zT8Ezjvoq+3eIcJqt4ZifUyb4b4vXr1e0yltp027aiGag= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171201160204.GI7754@ziepe.ca> References: <151197872943.26211.6551382719053304996.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <151197873499.26211.11687422577653326365.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20171130095323.ovrq2nenb6ztiapy@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20171130174201.stbpuye4gu5rxwkm@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20171130181741.2y5nyflyhqxg6y5p@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20171130190117.GF7754@ziepe.ca> <20171201101218.mxjyv4fc4cjwhf2o@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20171201160204.GI7754@ziepe.ca> From: Dan Williams Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 08:29:53 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] mm: introduce get_user_pages_longterm To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Michal Hocko , Andrew Morton , Linux MM , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Christoph Hellwig , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" , linux-rdma Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 11:12:18AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 30-11-17 12:01:17, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:32:42AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > > > > > Who and how many LRU pages can pin that way and how do you prevent nasty > > > > > users to DoS systems this way? > > > > > > > > I assume this is something the RDMA community has had to contend with? > > > > I'm not an RDMA person, I'm just here to fix dax. > > > > > > The RDMA implementation respects the mlock rlimit > > > > OK, so then I am kind of lost in why do we need a special g-u-p variant. > > The documentation doesn't say and quite contrary it assumes that the > > caller knows what he is doing. This cannot be the right approach. > > I thought it was because get_user_pages_longterm is supposed to fail > on DAX mappings? Correct, the rlimit checks are a separate issue, get_user_pages_longterm is only there to avoid open coding vma lookup and vma_is_fsdax() checks in multiple code paths. > And maybe we should think about moving the rlimit accounting into this > new function too someday? DAX pages are not accounted in any rlimit because they are statically allocated reserved memory regions.