From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755847AbbLBWDs (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 2 Dec 2015 17:03:48 -0500
Received: from mail-yk0-f178.google.com ([209.85.160.178]:36653 "EHLO
	mail-yk0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750798AbbLBWDr (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 2 Dec 2015 17:03:47 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <565F69FE.601@intel.com>
References: <1448309082-20851-1-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hpe.com>
	<CAPcyv4gY2SZZwiv9DtjRk4js3gS=vf4YLJvmsMJ196aps4ZHcQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1449022764.31589.24.camel@hpe.com>
	<CAPcyv4hzjMkwx3AA+f5Y9zfp-egjO-b5+_EU7cGO5BGMQaiN_g@mail.gmail.com>
	<1449078237.31589.30.camel@hpe.com>
	<CAPcyv4ikJ73nzQTCOfnBRThkv=rZGPM76S7=6O3LSB4kQBeEpw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPcyv4j1vA6eAtjsE=kGKeF1EqWWfR+NC7nUcRpfH_8MRqpM8Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<1449084362.31589.37.camel@hpe.com>
	<CAPcyv4jt7JmWCgcsd=p32M322sCyaar4Pj-k+F446XGZvzrO8A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1449086521.31589.39.camel@hpe.com>
	<1449087125.31589.45.camel@hpe.com>
	<CAPcyv4hvX_s3xN9UZ69v7npOhWVFehfGDPZG1MsDmKWBk4Gq1A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1449092226.31589.50.camel@hpe.com>
	<CAPcyv4jtVkptiFhiFP=2KXvDXs=Tw17pF=249sLj2fw-0vgsEg@mail.gmail.com>
	<565F69FE.601@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 14:03:46 -0800
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4i0n=2+WMACVumvMHsXZ7xzBuzvO6WA9H06N_-S=s3ibQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix mmap MAP_POPULATE for DAX pmd mapping
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
        Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>, mauricio.porto@hpe.com,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> wrote:
> On 12/02/2015 12:54 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com> wrote:
>>> > On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 11:57 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
>> [..]
>>>> >> The whole point of __get_user_page_fast() is to avoid the overhead of
>>>> >> taking the mm semaphore to access the vma.  _PAGE_SPECIAL simply tells
>>>> >> __get_user_pages_fast that it needs to fallback to the
>>>> >> __get_user_pages slow path.
>>> >
>>> > I see.  Then, I think gup_huge_pmd() can simply return 0 when !pfn_valid(),
>>> > instead of VM_BUG_ON.
>> Is pfn_valid() a reliable check?  It seems to be based on a max_pfn
>> per node... what happens when pmem is located below that point.  I
>> haven't been able to convince myself that we won't get false
>> positives, but maybe I'm missing something.
>
> With sparsemem at least, it makes sure that you're looking at a valid
> _section_.  See the pfn_valid() at ~include/linux/mmzone.h:1222.

At a minimum we would need to add "depends on SPARSEMEM" to "config FS_DAX_PMD".